Rochester Mills White Collar Crime Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard L. Cooper
About | Services
The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.
848 Brickell Avenue Suite 800 Miami, FL 33131Â» view map
DWI/DUI, Drug Trafficking, Felony
Nationally Ranked Top 40 Under 40

With Richard L. Cooper you can expect a trusted confidant who will work diligently to fully understand your case and determine a road map to help you regain control of your life.

800-756-2781
1. Richard L. Cooper Miami, FL
  Attorney at Law - FL, 2011
  Nova Southeastern University, J.D.
2. AboutMiami Attorney at Law
  Covering all Felonies and Misdemeanors including drugs, theft, DUI, probation violations, and much more.
3. ServicesCriminal Defense
  We know that being faced with a serious criminal charge is frightening.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Video
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Rochester Mills White Collar Crime lawyer.
Below are all Rochester Mills Criminal lawyers.

Joseph Drew Ryan

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal

Joseph Drew Ryan is a practicing lawyer in Pennsylvania handling criminal defense matters.

CONTACT

814-653-2042

449 E Main St, Reynoldsville, PA 15851

William A. Shaw

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Criminal

William Shaw is a practicing lawyer in the state of PA handling personal injury matters.

CONTACT

814-762-0004

225 E Market St, Clearfield, PA 16830

Robert S. Donaldson

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

The Lusardi Building, 508 Allegheny Street, Hollidaysburg, PA 16648

Lisa Galloway Monzo

Litigation, Estate Planning, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1100 Summit Drive, Greensburg, PA 15601

Robert I. Johnston

Constitutional Law, Dispute Resolution, Legal Malpractice, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Belden Building, 117 North Main Street, Greensburg, PA 15601

Meagan Bilik DeFazio

Criminal, Estate Planning, Family Law, Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

126 South Pennsylvania Avenue, Greensburg, PA 15601

Jeffrey D. Monzo

Litigation, Estate Planning, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1100 Summit Drive, Greensburg, PA 15601

James A. Horchak

Employment, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

550 East Pittsburgh Street, Greensburg, PA 15601

Robert S. Muir

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

922 Philadelphia Street, Indiana, PA 15701

Jennifer L. Westrick

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Divorce, Child Custody

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

832 Philadelphia Street, Indiana, PA 15701

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Rochester Mills White Collar Crime Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Joseph Drew Ryan

William A. Shaw

Robert S. Donaldson

Lisa Galloway Monzo

Robert I. Johnston

Meagan Bilik DeFazio

Jeffrey D. Monzo

James A. Horchak

Robert S. Muir

Jennifer L. Westrick

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INSANITY

MENS REA

JURY NULLIFICATION

SEARCH WARRANT

EAVESDROPPING

BURDEN OF PROOF

DIRECTED VERDICT

ASSAULT

LINEUP

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details