Roosevelt Felony Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

James Hill
About | Practice Areas
Russell & Hill, PLLC
1212 North Washington St. Suite 132 Spokane, WA 99201» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Professional, Personal, Proven

You have questions, and we have answers. Here at Russell & Hill, PLLC, we know how to obtain the most favorable outcome for your particular circumstances.

800-928-5340
1. James Hill Spokane, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 2001
  Seattle University J.D. 2001
2. AboutRussell & Hill, PLLC
  Professional, Personal, Proven
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Roosevelt Felony lawyer.
Below are all Roosevelt Criminal lawyers.

Lori Lynn Hoctor

Litigation, Family Law, State Government, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

104 South Grant Avenue, Goldendale, WA 98620

David Matthew Wall

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

205 South Columbus Ave, Goldendale, WA 98620

David Robert Quesnel

State Government, Government, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

205 S Columbus Ave, Goldendale, WA 98620

Gwendolyn Louise Grundei

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

Goldendale, WA 98620

Joy E. Duggan

Traffic, Juvenile Law, Guardianships & Conservatorships, Criminal

Status: Deceased Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

104 E Main St, Goldendale, WA 98620

Tyler C Everett

Real Estate, Estate, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

1313 W Wine Country Rd, Grandview, WA 98930

Tyler Everett

Estate, Family Law, Misdemeanor, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

1313 W Wine Country Rd, Grandview, WA 98930

Keally Laurleen Cieslik

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Granger, WA 98932

Lavette Nadine Holman

Litigation, Indians & Native Populations, Criminal, Immigration

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

121 Sunnyside Ave, Granger, WA 98932

Howard M. Saxton

Land Use & Zoning, Federal, Estate Planning, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

1112 Meade Ave, Prosser, WA 99350

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

BAILIFF

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to mai... (more...)

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to maintain order in the courtroom. In addition, bailiffs often help court proceedings go smoothly by shepherding witnesses in and out of the courtroom and handing evidence to witnesses as they testify. In criminal cases, the bailiff may have temporary charge of any defendant who is in custody during court proceedings.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

CRIMINAL CASE

A lawsuit brought by a prosecutor employed by the federal, state or local government that charges a person with the commission of a crime.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Roswell

... CHAMBERS, J. Â¶ 1 Washington has enacted certain criminal statutes that raise the level of a crime from a misdemeanor to a felony based upon the defendant's prior criminal convictions. ... FACTS. Â¶ 2 In 2005, Johnathon Roswell was charged with various felony sex offenses. ...

In re Brooks

... custody. The statutory maximum sentence for attempted robbery, a class B felony, is 120 months. ... custody. Attempted first degree robbery is a class B felony carrying a statutory maximum term of 10 years (120 months) and a $20,000 fine. ...

State v. Codiga

... Based on these misdemeanor convictions, the report concluded that neither felony had washed out and that the proper offender score was eight, thereby increasing the standard sentencing range. Codiga seeks to withdraw his guilty plea based on mutual mistake. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Roosevelt Felony Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

Russell & Hill, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Lori Lynn Hoctor

David Matthew Wall

David Robert Quesnel

Gwendolyn Louise Grundei

Joy E. Duggan

Tyler C Everett

Tyler Everett

Keally Laurleen Cieslik

Lavette Nadine Holman

Howard M. Saxton

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INTENTIONAL TORT

BURDEN OF PROOF

SELF-INCRIMINATION

DIRECTED VERDICT

BAILIFF

SPECIFIC INTENT

EAVESDROPPING

BURGLARY

CRIMINAL CASE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Roswell

In re Brooks

State v. Codiga

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details