Salem County, NJ Antitrust Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm


Includes: International Antitrust, Unfair Competition

Donald Masten

Trusts, Tax, Real Estate, Banking & Finance
Status:  In Good Standing           

George Rosenberger

Insurance, Land Use & Zoning
Status:  In Good Standing           

Scott Kramme

Tax, Business, Administrative Law, Family Law
Status:  In Good Standing           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find New Jersey Antitrust Lawyers and New Jersey Antitrust Law Firms for your location. Narrow your Antitrust attorney search for New Jersey by major city or a specific New Jersey city using the city list. Or search for New Jersey Antitrust attorneys by county. For more attorneys, search all Business areas including Administrative Law, Banking & Finance, Business Organization, Contract, Corporate, Insurance, Merger & Acquisition and Securities attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Lawn King, Inc.

... Involved are allegations of illegal restraints of trade in the operation of a franchise business in violation of the New Jersey Antitrust Act, NJSA 56:9-1 et seq. (L.1970, c. 73). ... The provisions of the franchise contracts form the basis of most of the antitrust charges here involved. ...

Pomanowski v. MONMOUTH CTY. BD. OF RELATORS

... The principal issue is whether that arrangement constitutes a violation of the New Jersey Antitrust Act, NJSA 56:9-1 to -19, as held by the court below, Pomanowski v. Monmouth County Board of Realtors, 175 NJ Super. 212 (Ch.Div. 1980). ...

Sickles v. Cabot Corp.

... At issue in this appeal is whether an indirect purchaser of an allegedly price-fixed product may state a claim for antitrust violations under the New Jersey Antitrust Act (ATA), NJSA 56:9-1 to -19, and the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), NJSA 56:8-1 to -20. ...