within 15 miles of Hawkinsville practice in Accident & Injury Georgia


David Venable, Attorney At Law, PC

Immigration, Criminal, Workers' Compensation, Divorce & Family Law, Accident & Injury

Asinc and Associates

Criminal, Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law

Walker Hulbert Gray & Moore, LLP

Federal Trial Practice, Criminal, Government, Accident & Injury, Business

Law Offices of Kristyne Seidenberg PC

Child Custody, Family Law, Education, Ethics, Accident & Injury

Daniel Lawson Tuggle & Jerles

Estate, Motor Vehicle, Employment, Child Custody, Property Damage

S.E. "Trey" Moody, III, P.C.

Personal Injury, Workers' Compensation, Municipal, Insurance, Civil Rights

Steven Harrell

Bankruptcy & Debt, Social Security, Personal Injury, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law

Walker & Walker, LLP

Criminal, Insurance, State and Local, Personal Injury, Employment

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Perry v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.

... [12] See Winters v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., 209 Ga.App. 369, 370(2), 433 SE2d 363 (1993) (policy language insuring against losses resulting from "bodily injury caused by accident" insured against injury by accidental means). [13] (Footnote omitted.) Provident etc. Ins. ...

Snyder v. State

... Compare OCGA § 40-6-275(c) (drivers of vehicles involved in an accident with no apparent serious personal injury or death have a duty to remove the vehicles from the roadway); OCGA § 40-6-273 (driver of a vehicle involved in an accident resulting in injury to or the death of ...

Williams v. Whitfield County

... "[The plaintiff] was merely using the bumper of the van for placement of the vise, and the van itself was only remotely related to the accident." [17] We, therefore, concluded that the plaintiff's injury did not "`originate in'" or "`flow from' the use of the van as a motor vehicle." [18]. ...