Seattle Criminal Lawyer, Washington, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jason Newcombe
About Us | Services
The Law Offices of Jason S. Newcombe
10700 Meridian Ave N #108 Seattle, WA 98133Â» view map
Criminal Defense, DWI/DUI, Misdemeanor
CONTACT US FOR A CONSULTATION

Our Washington State lawyers have the resources, the knowledge, and the experience to assist you with your legal matter in our practice areas.

800-699-2370
1. Jason Newcombe Seattle, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 1999
  Boston College Law School, J.D. - 1997
2. About UsServing Washington
  Offices in Seattle, Bellevue, Tacoma, Everett, and Olympia
3. ServicesExperienced Attorneys
  We always offer a free initial consultation and case evaluation
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Dustin Keith Burk

Criminal, DUI-DWI

CONTACT

425-212-9165

3811A Broadway, Everett, WA 98201

Jason Newcombe

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Bankruptcy & Debt, Accident & Injury, Traffic

From our offices in Seattle and throughout the state of Washington, we help families solve difficult legal problems and move on with their lives. ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-699-2370

1721 Hewitt Ave, Everett, WA 98201

Brian Ashbach

✓ VERIFIED

DUI-DWI, Domestic Violence & Neglect

Brian graduated with highest honors (summa cum laude) from Seattle University Law where he was a member of Law Review and winner of multiple awards, a... (more)

CONTACT

800-998-3580

4025 80th Street NE, Marysville, WA 98270

Jason Newcombe

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Bankruptcy & Debt, Accident & Injury, Traffic

From our offices in Seattle and throughout the state of Washington, we help families solve difficult legal problems and move on with their lives. ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-699-2370

3025 Limited Ln NW, Olympia, WA 98502

M. Preston White

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Felony, Traffic

Preston White is an attorney representing clients in criminal and family law cases in Olympia, Washington, and the surrounding counties. While serving... (more)

CONTACT

800-795-6130

1800 Cooper Pt Rd SW, Olympia, WA 98502

C. James Frush

Criminal, Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1000 Second Avenue Building, Seattle, WA 98104

Rayne J. Nelson

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

318 First Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98104

Harold F. Vhugen

Litigation, Child Custody, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

720 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104

John R. Crowley

White Collar Crime, Criminal, Constitutional Law, Antitrust

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

The Smith Tower, 506 2nd Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104

Brad A. Meryhew

Other, , Criminal, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

600 1st Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

INFORMATION

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or ... (more...)

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or a misdemeanor. The information tells the defendant what crime he is charged with, against whom and when the offense allegedly occurred, but the prosecutor is not obliged to go into great detail. If the defendant wants more specifics, he must ask for it by way of a discovery request. Compare indictment.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

... The Court of Appeals in each case held that the sentencing court improperly relied upon the State's assertion of the defendant's criminal history where the defendant did not stipulate to the criminal history and the State did not provide any evidence to establish the prior ...

State v. Momah

... 10 Article I, section 10 provides that "[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly." The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant the right to a "public trial by an impartial jury ...

State v. Codiga

... 2 Discovery of additional criminal history, rather than legal error, caused the increased offender score in this case. Codiga's ... form. Â¶ 5 The plea form also lists the prosecuting attorney's statement of Codiga's criminal history. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Seattle Criminal Lawyer, Washington, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Jason S. Newcombe

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Dustin Keith Burk

Jason Newcombe

Brian Ashbach

Jason Newcombe

M. Preston White

C. James Frush

Rayne J. Nelson

Harold F. Vhugen

John R. Crowley

Brad A. Meryhew

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

ASSAULT

ACCOMPLICE

INFORMATION

SPECIFIC INTENT

PLEA BARGAIN

GRAND JURY

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

State v. Momah

State v. Codiga

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details