Shirleysburg DUI-DWI Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Mark Guralnick
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick
55 Madison Avenue 4th Floor Morristown, NJ 07960Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Dedicated. Fearless. Successful.

Mark S. Guralnick and his legal team have helped clients throughout the USA and across the world by applying unparalleled dedication and hard work to each case.

800-399-8371
1. Mark Guralnick Morristown, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 1984
  Shepard Broad Law Center J.D.1984
2. AboutLaw Office of Mark S. Guralnick
  Our firm assists clients in a wide variety of legal challenges.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Robert S. Donaldson

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

The Lusardi Building, 508 Allegheny Street, Hollidaysburg, PA 16648

Michael J. Wagner

Workers' Compensation, Employment, Labor Law, Divorce, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

153 Lakemont Park Blvd., Altoona, PA 16602

Jason S. Dunkle

DUI-DWI, Domestic Violence & Neglect, , Firearms, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

112 West Foster Avenue, State College, PA 16801

Mark F. Bayley

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

17 West South Street, Carlisle, PA 17013

Nancy Schrum Searer

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Child Custody, Child Support

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

12 South Main Street, Lewistown, PA 17044

Steve Rice

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

223 Lincoln Way East, Chambersburg, PA 17201

Kevin Matthew Taccino

Landlord-Tenant, Motor Vehicle, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

25 Penncraft Ave, Chambersburg, PA 17201

Cayla Eran Amsley

Traffic, Motor Vehicle, Estate, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

14 N Main Street, Chambersburg, PA 17201

Matthew Scott Militello

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

999 Lincoln Way East, Chambersburg, PA 17201

Mark Thomas Orndorf

Estate, Business, Wills & Probate, DUI-DWI, Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

1110 Kennebec Drive, Chambersburg, PA 17201

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Com. v. Haag

... In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether two offenses of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol ("DUI") occurring within one and one-half hours of each other should be considered first and second offenses for purposes of sentencing under the recidivist provisions of ...

Glidden v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

... County (trial court) that denied his statutory appeal from a one-year suspension of his operating privileges for a violation of Section 3802(a)(1) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.CS Â§ 3802(a)(1) (driving under the influence of alcohol or controlled substance (DUI), general impairment). ...

Reinhart v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

... suspended Licensee's operating privileges because of three criminal convictions arising from a single accident: reckless driving; failing to stop his vehicle at an accident scene where 168 death or personal injury was involved; and driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Shirleysburg DUI-DWI Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert S. Donaldson

Michael J. Wagner

Jason S. Dunkle

Mark F. Bayley

Nancy Schrum Searer

Steve Rice

Kevin Matthew Taccino

Cayla Eran Amsley

Matthew Scott Militello

Mark Thomas Orndorf

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

IMPRISON

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BURDEN OF PROOF

ACQUITTAL

WARRANT

MOTION IN LIMINE

JURY NULLIFICATION

PROSECUTE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Com. v. Haag

Glidden v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Reinhart v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details