Tecumseh DUI-DWI Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Tricia Terry
About | Articles
Marrs & Terry, PLLC
6553 Jackson Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103Â» view map
Bankruptcy & Debt, Criminal Defense, Estate
Personalized, Efficient Counsel

Marrs & Terry, PLLC have been helping individuals face a variety of legal challenges, including bankruptcy, estate planning and administration, and family law.

800-862-7221
1. Tricia Terry Ann Arbor, MI
  Attorney at Law- MI, 1999
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School, J.D.
2. AboutExperienced Michigan Lawyer
  For more information about Tricia Terry
3. Articles
  Click here to read some legal arcticles published by Tricia Terry
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Stacey M. Washington

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

214 South Main Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Jeffrey G. Bennett

Farms, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

214 South Main Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104

William Harold Walker

Divorce, Child Custody, DUI-DWI, Corporate

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

160 North Winter Street, Adrian, MI 49221

Robert B. June

Mass Torts, Farms, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Consumer Protection

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

415 Detroit St, Ann Arbor, MI 48104

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

McCarthy v. BROWNSTOWN TOWNSHIP

... On March 19, 2007, a local business owner, whose son had been prosecuted for a DUI in Brownstown, came to a board [of trustees] meeting to discuss an anonymous letter alleging a township officer received preferential treatment relating to a DUI stop. ...

People v. Ward

... In State v Eaton, [13] the defendant was arrested for driving while under the influence (DUI) and transported to the county jail. ... Defendant was charged with one count of DUI and one count of possession of a controlled substance. ...

People v. Ward

... In State v. Eaton, [13] the defendant was arrested for driving while under the influence (DUI) and transported to the county jail. ... Defendant was charged with one count of DUI and one count of possession of a controlled substance. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Tecumseh DUI-DWI Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Marrs & Terry, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Stacey M. Washington

Jeffrey G. Bennett

William Harold Walker

Robert B. June

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

LARCENY

ACTUS REUS

PROSECUTE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CRIMINAL INSANITY

ACCOMPLICE

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

JURY

INSANITY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

McCarthy v. BROWNSTOWN TOWNSHIP

People v. Ward

People v. Ward

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details