Upland DUI-DWI Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Michael Holmes
About | Practice Areas
Orange County Criminal Attorney Law Firm
4000 MacArthur Blvd Suite 621 East Tower Newport Beach, CA 92660Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Proudly Serving Orange County

You need an attorney with criminal defense knowledge who will vigorously protect your rights and interests.

800-956-1140
1. Michael Holmes Newport Beach, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 2002
  Trinity Law School J.D.
2. AboutOrange County Criminal Attorney Law Firm
  Proudly Serving Orange County
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

James David Madden

Litigation, International Other, DUI-DWI, Child Custody

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

255 W Foothill Blvd, Upland, CA 91786

Paul Thomsen

Litigation, DUI-DWI, Insurance, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

818. N Mountain Ave, Upland, CA 91786

Kirk Matthew Tarman

Juvenile Law, Domestic Violence & Neglect, , Firearms, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

9333 Base Line Rd, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730

Christine Danielle Thielo

Divorce, Child Custody, Adoption, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

480 N Indian Hill Blvd, Claremont, CA 91711

John Holmes

DUI-DWI, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

500 East E Street, Ontario, CA 91764

Francisco Amado Suarez

Criminal, Employment, Other, Civil & Human Rights, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

140 W Foothill Blvd, Claremont, CA 91711

Jonathan Carlos Ibanez

Wills & Probate, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Collection

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

320 E D St, Chino, CA 91764

Alma M. Cloudt

Juvenile Law, International, DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729

Alma Margaret Cloudt

Juvenile Law, International, DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729

Raul Coretana Sabado

Divorce & Family Law, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

445 W Foothill Blvd, Claremont, CA 91711

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

ACCESSORY

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An acces... (more...)

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An accessory is usually not physically present during the crime. For example, hiding a robber who is being sought by the police might make you an 'accessory after the fact' to a robbery. Compare accomplice.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. McNeal

... liquor" in violation of the generic DUI law. (Id., 772 A.2d at pp. 1088, 1091.) The Vermont Supreme Court agreed. (Id. at p. 1091.) The court observed that "any evidence raising a doubt as to [the] defendant's condition, which is the ultimate question in a generic DWI prosecution . ...

People v. Landon

... OPINION. LAMBDEN, J.â€”. On August 14, 2008, defendant pleaded guilty to driving under the influence (DUI) with a blood-alcohol level greater than 0.08 percent (Veh. Code, Â§ 23152, subd. (b)); she admitted four prior DUI 1099 convictions. ...

People v. Patel

... In exchange for a grant of probation, defendant Javid Patel entered negotiated pleas of no contest to alternative felony counts of "generic" and "per se" [1] negligent driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) that resulted in bodily injury to another, and a misdemeanor count of ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Upland DUI-DWI Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

Orange County Criminal Attorney Law Firm

SPONSORED LAWYERS

James David Madden

Paul Thomsen

Kirk Matthew Tarman

Christine Danielle Thielo

John Holmes

Francisco Amado Suarez

Jonathan Carlos Ibanez

Alma M. Cloudt

Alma Margaret Cloudt

Raul Coretana Sabado

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MISTRIAL

PLEA BARGAIN

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

CIVIL

NOLLE PROSEQUI

SEARCH WARRANT

ACCESSORY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. McNeal

People v. Landon

People v. Patel

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details