Wauconda DUI-DWI Lawyer, Illinois, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gregory R. LaPapa
About | Practice Areas
LaPapa Law Group
10704 S Western Ave Chicago, IL 60643» view map
Accident & Injury Law, Criminal Defense
Changing Lives One Case At A Time

At LaPapa Law Group, we understand that life doesn’t always go as planned. We have the knowledge and experience needed to competently represent you in court.

800-694-2681
1. Gregory R. LaPapa Chicago, IL
  Attorney at Law - IL, 1982
  DePaul University J.D. 1982
2. AboutLaPapa Law Group
  We have been in practice for over 30 years.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law, Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Donald Brewer

Traffic, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

444 N. Route 31, Crystal Lake, IL 60012

Edward Joseph Donahue

DUI-DWI, Traffic, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

4310 Crystal Lake Road, Mchenry, IL 60050

Edward Donahue

DUI-DWI, Traffic, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

4310 Crystal Lake Road, Mchenry, IL 60050

Edward M. Rothschild

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 52 Years

CONTACT

16 Monterey Drive, Vernon Hills, IL 60061

Harry H. Semrow

Traffic, International Tax, Estate Planning, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

Mchenry, IL 60051

Harry Semrow

International Tax, DUI-DWI, Traffic, Estate Planning

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

Mchenry, IL 60051

J. Kevin Mcbride

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Divorce, Family Law

Status: Inactive Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

2015 W Johnsburg Rd, Mchenry, IL 60051

James Darrell Adkins

Real Estate, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

3007 Charlotte Ave, Crystal Lake, IL 60050

James C. Bakk

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Civil Rights, Transactions

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

111 E. Winchester Road, Libertyville, IL 60048

James Bakk

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Civil Rights, Transactions

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

111 E. Winchester Road, Libertyville, IL 60048

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Van Schoyck

... objection, dismissed the three citations and recharged defendant, in an information, with driving with a blood-alcohol content over 0.08, noting in the charge the existence of the sentence-enhancing factor (driving on a revoked license), which elevated the DUI offense to ...

People v. Gonzalez

... begin there. Prior to January 1, 2006, section 11-501 provided that driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs (DUI) constituted aggravated DUI in six instances, none of which are relevant to further discussion. However, section ...

People v. Prouty

... After a bench trial, defendant, Edmund T. Prouty, was convicted of aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) (625 ILCS 5/11 â€” 501(d)(1)(A) (West 2006)). ... The indictment stated that aggravated DUI was a Class 2 felony. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Wauconda DUI-DWI Lawyer, Illinois, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

LaPapa Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Donald Brewer

Edward Joseph Donahue

Edward Donahue

Edward M. Rothschild

Harry H. Semrow

Harry Semrow

J. Kevin Mcbride

James Darrell Adkins

James C. Bakk

James Bakk

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

FEDERAL COURT

MISTRIAL

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

NOLO CONTENDERE

SPECIFIC INTENT

IMPEACH

JURY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Van Schoyck

People v. Gonzalez

People v. Prouty

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details