Wrangell DUI-DWI Lawyer, Alaska

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Daniel Allan
About | Practice Areas
Dan Allan & Associates
800 E Dimond Blvd Suite 3-620 Anchorage, AK 99515» view map
Criminal Defense
More Than Just A Law Firm

At the Law Offices of Dan Allan and Associates, we believe in helping our clients get rid of some the stress their facing.

907-344-8851
1. Daniel Allan Anchorage, AK
  Attorney at Law- AK
  University of Tulsa College of Law, J.D. 1967
2. AboutDan Allan & Associates
  More Than Just A Law Firm
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Wrangell DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Wrangell lawyers.

Rolland Benn Curtis Wimberley

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 7 Years

CONTACT

Wrangell, AK 99929

Sheri Ladawn Ridgeway

Juvenile Law, Estate Planning, Family Law, Gay & Lesbian Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

112 Federal Way, Wrangell, AK 99929

Laurie J Hutchings

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

Wrangell, AK 99929

Deliza N. Spangler

General Practice

Status: Retired

CONTACT

Wrangell, AK 99929

Michael Patrick Nash

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

Wrangell, AK 99929

Sheri Ladawn Ridgeway

General Practice

Status: Suspended Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

112 Federal Way, Wrangell, AK 99929

George L. Gucker

General Practice

Status: Deceased

CONTACT

Meyers Chuck, AK 99903

William L Thomason

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

Thorne Bay, AK 99919

Ronnalie J. Roper

General Practice

Status: Deceased Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

Thorne Bay, AK 99919

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

MISDEMEANOR

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk d... (more...)

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk driving and leaving the scene of an accident are all common misdemeanors.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Hewitt v. State

... Accordingly, the evidence presented at Hewitt's trial is sufficient to support the jury's verdicts. Hewitt's claim that a new jury venire should have been summoned after the trial judge mistakenly began to read the allegation in the indictment that Hewitt had prior convictions for DUI. ...

Bradley v. State

... This appeal followed. Why we find that Bradley has not shown that the superior court committed plain error when it refused to dismiss the DUI charge or to suppress the DataMaster test results. ... Why we find that there was sufficient evidence to support Bradley's conviction for DUI. ...

Baker v. State

... In 1999, the crime of DWI was defined in AS 28.35.030(a)(1) as follows: "A person commits the crime of driving while intoxicated if the person operates or drives a motor vehicle or operates an aircraft or a watercraft while under the influence of intoxicating liquor." [24] In 1999, the ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Wrangell DUI-DWI Lawyer, Alaska

Sponsored Law Firm

Dan Allan & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Rolland Benn Curtis Wimberley

Sheri Ladawn Ridgeway

Laurie J Hutchings

Deliza N. Spangler

Michael Patrick Nash

Sheri Ladawn Ridgeway

George L. Gucker

William L Thomason

Ronnalie J. Roper

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CRIMINAL INSANITY

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

EAVESDROPPING

MISDEMEANOR

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

NOLLE PROSEQUI

MCNAGHTEN RULE

JURY NULLIFICATION

INDECENT EXPOSURE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Hewitt v. State

Bradley v. State

Baker v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details