Fairpoint DUI-DWI Lawyer, Ohio, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:
Sean Logue
Google+ | Contact Us
Sean Logue & Associates
200 First Avenue 3rd Floor #301A Pittsburgh, PA 15222 » view map
DUI, Sex Crimes, Drug Crimes, Expungements
Phones Answered 24 Hours A Day

Our lawyers bring a thorough understanding of criminal issues to help minimize the damage that a DUI charge can bring to our clients.

412-389-0805
1. Sean Logue Pittsburgh, PA
  Attorney At Law - Pennsylvania, 2008
  West Virginia, J.D. - 2007
2. Google+
  Visit us and follow on Google+ to interact on social media.
3. Contact UsEmail or Call 24/7
  Free initial consultation. Contact us today.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Fairpoint DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Fairpoint Criminal lawyers.

Frank Joseph Bruzzese

Criminal, Corporate, Products Liability, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

300 Sinclair Building, Steubenville, OH 43952

Frank Wesley Noble

Juvenile Law, Estate, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

2017 Sunset Blvd, Steubenville, OH 43952

Amanda Jo Abrams

Federal Appellate Practice, Government, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

Chase Building, Steubenville, OH 43952

John Joseph Mascio

Juvenile Law, Estate, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 59 Years

CONTACT

424 Market St, Steubenville, OH 43952

Jane M. Hanlin

Health Care Other, Government, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

100 N 4Th St, Steubenville, OH 43952

Michelle Garcia Miller

Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

301 Market St, Steubenville, OH 43952

Adrian Vernon Hershey

Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

301 Market St, Steubenville, OH 43952

James William Peters

Employee Rights, Government, Criminal, Religious Discrimination

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

101 N Main St, Woodsfield, OH 43793

Richard Albert Yoss

Litigation, Government, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 56 Years

CONTACT

122 N Main St, Woodsfield, OH 43793

James Leland Peters

Employee Rights, Government, Criminal, Religious Discrimination

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

101 N Main St, Woodsfield, OH 43793

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Hoover

... consider the constitutionality of RC 4511.19(A)(2), which requires the imposition of criminal penalties upon certain persons who refuse to consent to chemical testing after being arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or a drug of abuse ("DUI"). ...

State v. Bragwell

... {Â¶2} On May 25, 2006, a Mahoning County grand jury indicted appellant on one count of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), a third-degree felony in violation of RC ... Appellant entered pleas of not guilty to the charge and specifications. This was appellant's thirteenth DUI. ...

State v. DETSKAS

... This question is relevant because Detskas was previously convicted in Michigan, under that state's law, for the offense of driving while impaired (DWI) (a lesser included offense of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Fairpoint DUI-DWI Lawyer, Ohio, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

Sean Logue & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Frank Joseph Bruzzese

Frank Wesley Noble

Amanda Jo Abrams

John Joseph Mascio

Jane M. Hanlin

Michelle Garcia Miller

Adrian Vernon Hershey

James William Peters

Richard Albert Yoss

James Leland Peters

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ACTUS REUS

SELF-DEFENSE

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

IMPEACH

MCNAGHTEN RULE

MOTION IN LIMINE

SENTENCE

ACCOMPLICE

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Hoover

State v. Bragwell

State v. DETSKAS

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS