Joliet DUI-DWI Lawyer, Illinois, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gordon H. Hirsch
About | Practice Areas
Hirsch Law Group
128 N. Scott St. Joliet, IL 60432» view map
Criminal Defense Law
We Defend Tough Cases

From simple, petty cases to the most complex criminal charges, we are dedicated to providing aggressive legal services to our clients.

800-878-2530
1. Gordon H. Hirsch Joliet, IL
  Attorney at Law - IL, 2000
  DePaul University J.D. 2000
2. AboutHirsch Law Group
  Former Prosecutor Turned Aggressive Criminal Defense Attorney
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Ryan Kosztya

Traffic, Family Law, Divorce, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

81 N. Chicago St, Joliet, IL 60432

Ryan S. Kosztya

Traffic, Family Law, Divorce, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

81 N. Chicago St, Joliet, IL 60432

Gregory Bernard Jumbeck

Traffic, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

6O N Chicago St, Crest Hill, IL 60432

Gregory Jumbeck

Traffic, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

6O N Chicago St, Crest Hill, IL 60432

Eugene Anthony Fimbianti

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

58 N Chicago St, Crest Hill, IL 60432

John Michael Kogut

Traffic, Workers' Compensation, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

58 E Clinton St, Joliet, IL 60432

Gary Scott Pyles

Traffic, Motor Vehicle, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

3260 Executive Drive, Joliet, IL 60431

Gary Pyles

Traffic, Motor Vehicle, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

3260 Executive Drive, Joliet, IL 60431

Thomas Polacek

Traffic, Employee Rights, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

3601 Mcdonough St, Joliet, IL 60431

Thomas Patrick Polacek

Traffic, Employee Rights, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

3601 Mcdonough St, Joliet, IL 60431

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY (D.A.)

A lawyer who is elected to represent a state government in criminal cases in a designated county or judicial district. A D.A.'s duties typically include reviewi... (more...)

A lawyer who is elected to represent a state government in criminal cases in a designated county or judicial district. A D.A.'s duties typically include reviewing police arrest reports, deciding whether to bring criminal charges against arrested people and prosecuting criminal cases in court. The D.A. may also supervise other attorneys, called Deputy District Attorneys or Assistant District Attorneys. In some states a District Attorney may be called a Prosecuting Attorney, County Attorney or State's Attorney. In the federal system, the equivalent to the D.A. is a United States Attorney. The country has many U.S. Attorneys, each appointed by the President, who supervise regional offices staffed with prosecutors called Assistant United States Attorneys.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Van Schoyck

... objection, dismissed the three citations and recharged defendant, in an information, with driving with a blood-alcohol content over 0.08, noting in the charge the existence of the sentence-enhancing factor (driving on a revoked license), which elevated the DUI offense to ...

People v. Gonzalez

... begin there. Prior to January 1, 2006, section 11-501 provided that driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs (DUI) constituted aggravated DUI in six instances, none of which are relevant to further discussion. However, section ...

People v. Prouty

... After a bench trial, defendant, Edmund T. Prouty, was convicted of aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) (625 ILCS 5/11 â€” 501(d)(1)(A) (West 2006)). ... The indictment stated that aggravated DUI was a Class 2 felony. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Joliet DUI-DWI Lawyer, Illinois, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

Hirsch Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Ryan Kosztya

Ryan S. Kosztya

Gregory Bernard Jumbeck

Gregory Jumbeck

Eugene Anthony Fimbianti

John Michael Kogut

Gary Scott Pyles

Gary Pyles

Thomas Polacek

Thomas Patrick Polacek

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ACCOMPLICE

INDECENT EXPOSURE

BAIL

MCNAGHTEN RULE

PLEA

INTERROGATION

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

DISTRICT ATTORNEY (D.A.)

SPECIFIC INTENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Van Schoyck

People v. Gonzalez

People v. Prouty

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details