within 15 miles of Kearney Nebraska


Jacobsen, Orr, Lindstrom & Holbrook, P.C., L.L.O.

Business, Criminal, Employment, Workers' Compensation

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Snyder, Hilliard & Bishop, L.L.O.

Family Law, Juvenile Law, Agriculture, Estate Planning, Commercial Real Estate

Snyder & Hilliard

Divorce, Child Custody, Agriculture, Banking & Finance, Litigation

Nye Hervert Jorgensen & Watson, P.C., L.L.O.

Elder Law, Agriculture, International Tax, Estate Planning, Civil Rights

Jacobsen, Orr, Lindstrom & Holbook P.C. LLO

Misdemeanor, Landlord-Tenant, Estate, Child Support, Criminal

Bishop Law P.C., L.L.O.

Family Law, DUI-DWI, Divorce & Family Law

Bruner Frank, L.L.C.

Felony, Criminal, Dispute Resolution, Immigration, Child Custody

Stamm Romero & Associates, Pc Llo

Credit & Debt, Bankruptcy, Criminal, Adoption, Franchising

Steffens Law Office, P.C.

Credit & Debt, Civil Rights, Workers' Compensation

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Walbridge v. City of Lincoln

... The Lincoln-Lancaster County Health Department-Animal Control Division (the Department), an agency of the City of Lincoln, declared the dog owned by appellants, James Walbridge and Sara Kay, to be a ... The bite occurred inside appellants' residence in Lincoln, Nebraska. ...

State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Thew

... (e) Marvel Nevels. In 2006, Marvel Nevels contacted Thew about representing her on an intellectual property case. Her initial consultation with Thew took place on January 12, 2006, at which time she paid Thew $50. Thew agreed ...

Dobrovolny v. Ford Motor Co.

... which public policy requires manufacturers to protect, independent of any contractual obligation." [17] The Supreme Court characterized the majority of courts as holding that strict liability cannot be imposed for damage to the product alone, while the minority imposed liability. ...