Bloomfield Criminal Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Ryan P. Barry
About | Practice Areas
Barry, Barall & Spinella, LLC
989 Main St Manchester, CT 06040» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Your Future Matters To Us

At Barry, Barall & Spinella, LLC, our only goal is to protect your best interests. We are accomplished attorneys whose focus is handling criminal defense & personal injury claims.

800-998-0430
1. Ryan P. Barry Manchester, CT
  Attorney at Law - CT, 2000
  University of Connecticut J.D. 1999
2. AboutBarry, Barall & Spinella, LLC
  Your Future Matters To Us
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Michael C. Conroy

Premises Liability, Litigation, Municipal, Criminal, Professional Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

945 Hopmeadow Street, Simsbury, CT 06070

Alan S Parker

Tax, White Collar Crime, Life & Health, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

90 State House Square, Hartford, CT 06103

Ashley Sook Hee Talley

Workers' Compensation, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

Hartford, CT 06104

Christopher R. Drury

Administrative Law, White Collar Crime, Litigation, Defamation & Slander

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1 Constitution Plaza, Hartford, CT 06103

Daniel E. Ryan

Medical Malpractice, Employment Discrimination, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

185 Asylum St, Hartford, CT 06103

Emanuel N Psarakis

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 65 Years

CONTACT

30 Brettonwood Dr, Simsbury, CT 06070

Erica B. Sherman

White Collar Crime

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

Hartford, CT 06104

Gerald S Sack

Medical Malpractice, Litigation, Employment Discrimination, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

836 Farmington Ave, Hartford, CT 06119

Gwen Jacklyn Zittoun

Education, Employment Discrimination, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1 Constitution Plaza, Hartford, CT 06103

J Xavier Pryor

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

525 Windsor Avenue, Windsor, CT 06095

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. TD

... to 2003) Â§ 54-251 and General Statutes Â§ 54-257. After a hearing, the trial court found that, because the defendant had failed to register as a sex offender, he had violated the condition of his probation that required him to not violate any criminal law. ...

State v. DeJesus

... we will maintain the liberal standard, but do so as a limited exception to the prohibition on the admission of uncharged misconduct evidence in sexual assault cases to prove that the defendant had a propensity to engage in aberrant and compulsive criminal sexual behavior. ...

State v. Salamon

... In accordance with these principles, we have not hesitated to revisit and overrule our prior holdings, including prior holdings applicable to criminal matters; see, eg, State v. Skakel, supra, at 693, 888 A.2d 985; State v. Miranda, supra, at 733-34, 878 A.2d 1118; State v. Colon ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Bloomfield Criminal Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm

Barry, Barall & Spinella, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Michael C. Conroy

Alan S Parker

Ashley Sook Hee Talley

Christopher R. Drury

Daniel E. Ryan

Emanuel N Psarakis

Erica B. Sherman

Gerald S Sack

Gwen Jacklyn Zittoun

J Xavier Pryor

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CORPUS DELECTI

HUNG JURY

INFORMED CONSENT

CHARGE

SEARCH WARRANT

NOLLE PROSEQUI

PROSECUTE

INTERROGATION

SELF-INCRIMINATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. TD

State v. DeJesus

State v. Salamon

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details