Bridgeview Juvenile Law Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Scott Kamin
About | Practice Areas
Law Offices of Scott T. Kamin
53 W. Jackson Blvd Suite 1057 Chicago, IL 60604» view map
Criminal Defense & Felony
If The Police Were Wrong, CALL SCOTT

My goal as your criminal defense lawyer is to help you minimize the consequences you face. I have extensive outside resources and an experienced staff on my side.

800-963-2980
1. Scott Kamin Chicago, IL
  Attorney at Law - IL, 1995
  Drake University J.D. 1994
2. AboutLaw Offices of Scott T. Kamin
  If The Police Were Wrong, CALL SCOTT
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense & Felony
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Kristal Rivers

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

10220 S 76Th Ave, Oak Lawn, IL 60455

Kristal Royce Rivers

Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

10220 S 76Th Ave, Oak Lawn, IL 60455

Kristal Royce Rivers

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

10220 S 76Th Ave, Oak Lawn, IL 60455

Jay Allen Fine

Juvenile Law, Landlord-Tenant, Traffic, Lawsuit

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

8695 Archer Ave, Willow Springs, IL 60480

John Murphey

Land Use & Zoning, Municipal, Public Schools, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

3318 W 95Th St, Evergreen Park, IL 60805

Diane N. Walsh

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

8 Calle View Dr, La Grange, IL 60525

Sue Roberts-kurpis

Divorce & Family Law, Divorce, Juvenile Law, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

3845 W 58Th Pl, Chicago, IL 60629

Jane Sunderland

Intellectual Property, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

106 W Calendar Ave, La Grange, IL 60525

Deborah Garrigus

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Family Law, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

10750 South 143Rd Street, Orland Park, IL 60462

Deborah S. Garrigus

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Family Law, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

10750 South 143Rd Street, Orland Park, IL 60462

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

BAILIFF

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to mai... (more...)

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to maintain order in the courtroom. In addition, bailiffs often help court proceedings go smoothly by shepherding witnesses in and out of the courtroom and handing evidence to witnesses as they testify. In criminal cases, the bailiff may have temporary charge of any defendant who is in custody during court proceedings.

CONTINGENCY FEE

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obt... (more...)

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obtains after settling or winning the case. Often contingency fee agreements -- which are most commonly used in personal injury cases -- award the successful lawyer between 20% and 50% of the amount recovered. Lawyers representing defendants charged with crimes may not charge contingency fees. In most states, contingency fee agreements must be in writing.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People ex rel. Birkett v. Konetski

... In declining to require registration, the respondent noted the minor was not afforded the right to a jury trial in this juvenile delinquency proceeding. ... The respondent further stated it is not appropriate to require registration without providing a juvenile the right to a jury trial. ...

In re Lakisha M.

... After a trial (705 ILCS 405/5-601 (West 2004)), a juvenile court found Lakisha guilty of committing the offense of aggravated battery, a Class 3 felony (720 ILCS 5/12-4(b)(3), (e) (West 2004)), [1] and adjudicated her delinquent. ...

People v. Coleman

... Defendant appeals, arguing (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for eliciting testimony from defendant regarding his prior juvenile conviction, and (2) the sentence for armed violence predicated on robbery as compared to the sentence for armed robbery with a firearm violates ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Bridgeview Juvenile Law Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices of Scott T. Kamin

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Kristal Rivers

Kristal Royce Rivers

Kristal Royce Rivers

Jay Allen Fine

John Murphey

Diane N. Walsh

Sue Roberts-kurpis

Jane Sunderland

Deborah Garrigus

Deborah S. Garrigus

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

FEDERAL COURT

DIRECTED VERDICT

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

SPECIFIC INTENT

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

BAILIFF

CONTINGENCY FEE

ACTUS REUS

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People ex rel. Birkett v. Konetski

In re Lakisha M.

People v. Coleman

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details