Calumet City White Collar Crime Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Scott Kamin
About | Practice Areas
Law Offices of Scott T. Kamin
53 W. Jackson Blvd Suite 1057 Chicago, IL 60604» view map
Criminal Defense & Felony
If The Police Were Wrong, CALL SCOTT

My goal as your criminal defense lawyer is to help you minimize the consequences you face. I have extensive outside resources and an experienced staff on my side.

800-963-2980
1. Scott Kamin Chicago, IL
  Attorney at Law - IL, 1995
  Drake University J.D. 1994
2. AboutLaw Offices of Scott T. Kamin
  If The Police Were Wrong, CALL SCOTT
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense & Felony
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Khaled Issa

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, White Collar Crime, Personal Injury

Orland Park, Illinois Criminal Defense Attorney

Khaled Issa is a well-versed trial attorney with more than 10 years of legal experience. Knowledgeable in many areas of law, Attorney Issa concentrate... (more)

CONTACT

708-966-2408

10660 W 143rd Street, Suite A2, Orland Park, IL 60462

James F. Diquattro

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, White Collar Crime

Chicago, IL Criminal Defense Attorney

Our offices concentrate on practicing criminal defense for individuals facing charges of felonies and misdemeanors at both the state and federal level... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

312-627-9482

900 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60607

Hal M. Garfinkel

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Felony, DUI-DWI, Domestic Violence & Neglect, White Collar Crime

Have you been investigated for or charged with a serious criminal offense such as homicide, drug charges or a gun crime? Are you seeking experienced, ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

312-629-0669

120 N LaSalle St, Chicago, IL 60602

Andrew M. Weisberg

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Felony, Misdemeanor, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI

A CHICAGO DEFENSE ATTORNEY WHO KNOWS HOW THE OTHER SIDE THINKS

The Law Office of Andrew M. Weisberg is 100% dedicated to the practice of criminal defense in Chicago, Cook County and the neighboring suburbs. Mr. W... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-815-1310

444 N Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL 60611

Dennis Giovannini

Traffic, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

300 East Randolph Street, Chicago, IL 60601

Mark David Belongia

Litigation, White Collar Crime, Banking & Finance, Business

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

55 E Monroe St, Chicago, IL 60601

Gary W. Adair

Traffic, Federal Appellate Practice, White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

900 W Jackson Blvd, Chicago, IL 60607

James Lascola

Real Estate, Elder Law, Estate, White Collar Crime

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

20 North Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60602

Anthony Schumann

Employment, White Collar Crime

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

230 W Monroe St, Chicago, IL 60606

Samuel Bayard Isaacson

Lawsuit & Dispute, Merger & Acquisition, White Collar Crime, Securities

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

233 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 60606

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Calumet City White Collar Crime Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices of Scott T. Kamin

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Khaled Issa

James F. Diquattro

Hal M. Garfinkel

Andrew M. Weisberg

Dennis Giovannini

Mark David Belongia

Gary W. Adair

James Lascola

Anthony Schumann

Samuel Bayard Isaacson

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ARRAIGNMENT

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

SEARCH WARRANT

SPECIFIC INTENT

JURY NULLIFICATION

PROBABLE CAUSE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details