Centreville RICO Act Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Nickolas Hannawa
About | Practice Areas
Hannawa Law PC
2909 E Big Beaver Rd Troy, MI 48083» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Full-service legal experts on your side.

Whatever the specific details of your situation may be, our attorneys are ready to fight for you and guide you through every step of the process.

248-466-0770
1. Nickolas Hannawa Troy, MI
  Attorney at Law, MI
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School, J.D. 2013
2. AboutHannawa Law PC
  Full-service legal experts on your side.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Centreville RICO Act lawyer.
Below are all Centreville Criminal lawyers.

Laurie Ann Hines

Criminal, Trusts, Juvenile Law, Family Law, Divorce

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

136 W Main St, Centreville, MI 49032

John David Edgar

Family Law, Divorce, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

63588 Shimmel Rd, Centreville, MI 49032

Kevin R. Kleidon

Children's Rights, Family Law, Criminal, Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

136 W Main St, Centreville, MI 49032

Timothy James Reed

Employment, Criminal, Civil Rights, Medical Malpractice, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

227 W Chicago Rd, Sturgis, MI 49091

John P. Bush

Estate Planning, Criminal, Elder Law, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

208 W Chicago Rd, Sturgis, MI 49091

Deborah J. Davis

Estate Planning, Estate, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

108 W. Streetate Street, Colon, MI 49040

Luke D. Nofsinger

Other, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 9 Years

CONTACT

38 N Main St, Three Rivers, MI 49093

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Centreville RICO Act Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Hannawa Law PC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Laurie Ann Hines

John David Edgar

Kevin R. Kleidon

Timothy James Reed

John P. Bush

Deborah J. Davis

Luke D. Nofsinger

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CRIMINAL LAW

IMPRISON

INDECENT EXPOSURE

CONVICTION

ACQUITTAL

ARREST WARRANT

INTERROGATION

SPECIFIC INTENT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details