Palos Verdes Peninsula RICO Act Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gil L. Arbel
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Gil L. Arbel
28541 Conejo View Dr. Agoura Hills, CA 91301» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Devoted Legal Advocacy

At the Law Offices of Gil L. Arbel, we understand that legal matters can be intimidating and complicated, which is why it is crucial to take an informed approach.

800-961-3980
1. Gil L. Arbel Agoura Hills, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 2014
  USC Law School J.D. 2014
2. AboutLaw Office of Gil L. Arbel
  Ready To Help You Be Resoundingly Successful
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Gina Tennen

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Military, Juvenile Law, White Collar Crime, RICO Act

LibertyBell Law Group consists of a group of elite criminal defense attorneys who have become some of the most sought after lawyers in the nation. Our... (more)

CONTACT

800-871-5930

245 E. Olive Ave., Burbank, CA 91502

Shaun Khojayan

Criminal, White Collar Crime, RICO Act, Felony

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

515 S. Flower St., Los Angeles, CA 90071

Craig Wilke

White Collar Crime, RICO Act, Felony, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

305 N. Harbor Blvd., Fullerton, CA 92832

Kenneth Benton Julian

Litigation, White Collar Crime, RICO Act, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

695 Town Center Dr, Costa Mesa, CA 92626

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Palos Verdes Peninsula RICO Act Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Gil L. Arbel

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Gina Tennen

Shaun Khojayan

Craig Wilke

Kenneth Benton Julian

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

ARRAIGNMENT

FEDERAL COURT

CIVIL

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

EAVESDROPPING

CAPITAL CASE

PROSECUTE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details