Warroad Family Law Lawyer, Minnesota

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Shelley Torvinen
About | Practice Areas
Wiscota Law and Mediation PLLC
11 East Superior St Suite 504 Duluth, MN 55802» view map
Divorce & Family Law
Your Trusted, Experienced Local Attorney

When you choose mediation through Wiscota Law & Mediation, you can work together for a more agreeable outcome and greatly reduce your legal fees.

800-918-9221
1. Shelley Torvinen Duluth, MN
  Attorney at Law - MN, 1993
  Hamline University J.D. 1993
2. AboutWiscota Law and Mediation PLLC
  Your Trusted, Experienced Local Attorney
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Divorce & Family Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Includes: Collaborative Law, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Paternity, Prenuptial Agreements

Not enough matches for Warroad Family Law lawyer.
Below are all Warroad lawyers.

Steven Axel Anderson

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

115 Roberts Av Ne, Warroad, MN 56763

Steven Axel Anderson

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

115 Roberts Av Ne, Warroad, MN 56763

Nora Linne Crumpton

Divorce, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

115 Roberts Avenue N.E., Warroad, MN 56763

Steven A. Anderson

Traffic, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

115 Roberts Ave NE, Warroad, MN 56763

Steven Axel Anderson

General Practice

Status: Suspended Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

253 Oak Rd, Warroad, MN 56763

Kristy Rae Kjos

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

606 Fifth Ave Sw, Roseau, MN 56751

Harold G Myhre

General Practice

Status: Deceased Licensed: 69 Years

CONTACT

212 Birch Drive North, Warroad, MN 56763

Joseph A Harren

General Practice

Status: Retired Licensed: 73 Years

CONTACT

32683 645Th Avenue, Warroad, MN 56763

Donna Kay Dixon

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

606 5Th Ave Sw, Roseau, MN 56751

Michael Patrick Grover

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

606 5Th Avenue S.W., Roseau, MN 56751

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INTERLOCUTORY DECREE

A court judgment that is not final until the judge decides other matters in the case or until enough time has passed to see if the interim decision is working. ... (more...)

A court judgment that is not final until the judge decides other matters in the case or until enough time has passed to see if the interim decision is working. In the past, interlocutory decrees were most often used in divorces. The terms of the divorce were set out in an interlocutory decree, which would become final only after a waiting period. The purpose of the waiting period was to allow the couple time to reconcile. They rarely did, however, so most states no longer use interlocutory decrees of divorce.

DILUTION

A situation in which a famous trademark or service mark is used in a context in which the mark's reputation for quality is tarnished or its distinction is blurr... (more...)

A situation in which a famous trademark or service mark is used in a context in which the mark's reputation for quality is tarnished or its distinction is blurred. In this case, trademark infringement exists even though there is no likelihood of customer confusion, which is usually required in cases of trademark infringement. For example, the use of the word Candyland for a pornographic site on the Internet was ruled to dilute the reputation of the Candyland mark for the well-known children's game, even though the traditional basis for trademark infringement (probable customer confusion) wasn't an issue.

IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES

Differences between spouses that are considered sufficiently severe to make married life together more or less impossible. In a number of states, irreconcilable... (more...)

Differences between spouses that are considered sufficiently severe to make married life together more or less impossible. In a number of states, irreconcilable differences is the accepted ground for a no-fault divorce. As a practical matter, courts seldom, if ever, inquire into what the differences actually are, and routinely grant a divorce as long as the party seeking the divorce says the couple has irreconcilable differences. Compare incompatibility; irremediable breakdown.

DIVORCE AGREEMENT

An agreement made by a divorcing couple regarding the division of property, custody and visitation of the children, alimony or child support. The agreement must... (more...)

An agreement made by a divorcing couple regarding the division of property, custody and visitation of the children, alimony or child support. The agreement must be put in writing, signed by the parties and accepted by the court. It becomes part of the divorce decree and does away with the necessity of having a trial on the issues covered by the agreement. A divorce agreement may also be called a marital settlement agreement, marital termination agreement or settlement agreement.

CRUELTY

Any act of inflicting unnecessary emotional or physical pain. Cruelty or mental cruelty is the most frequently used fault ground for divorce because as a practi... (more...)

Any act of inflicting unnecessary emotional or physical pain. Cruelty or mental cruelty is the most frequently used fault ground for divorce because as a practical matter, courts will accept minor wrongs or disagreements as sufficient evidence of cruelty to justify the divorce.

GROUNDS FOR DIVORCE

Legal reasons for requesting a divorce. All states require a spouse who files for divorce to state the grounds, court and whether requesting a fault divorce or ... (more...)

Legal reasons for requesting a divorce. All states require a spouse who files for divorce to state the grounds, court and whether requesting a fault divorce or a no-fault divorce.

MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE

A document that provides proof of a marriage, typically issued to the newlyweds a few weeks after they file for the certificate in a county office. Most states ... (more...)

A document that provides proof of a marriage, typically issued to the newlyweds a few weeks after they file for the certificate in a county office. Most states require both spouses, the person who officiated the marriage and one or two witnesses to sign the marriage certificate; often this is done just after the ceremony.

GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE

Someone appointed by a court to care for the property of a minor child that is not supervised by an adult under some other legal method, such as a trust. A guar... (more...)

Someone appointed by a court to care for the property of a minor child that is not supervised by an adult under some other legal method, such as a trust. A guardian of the estate may also be called a 'property guardian' or 'financial guardian.' See also guardian.

BRIEF

A document used to submit a legal contention or argument to a court. A brief typically sets out the facts of the case and a party's argument as to why she shoul... (more...)

A document used to submit a legal contention or argument to a court. A brief typically sets out the facts of the case and a party's argument as to why she should prevail. These arguments must be supported by legal authority and precedent, such as statutes, regulations and previous court decisions. Although it is usually possible to submit a brief to a trial court (called a trial brief), briefs are most commonly used as a central part of the appeal process (an appellate brief). But don't be fooled by the name -- briefs are usually anything but brief, as pointed out by writer Franz Kafka, who defined a lawyer as 'a person who writes a 10,000 word decision and calls it a brief.'

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Do v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co.

... 548.251. When the underlying facts of a case are undisputed, an appellate court will review de novo the district court's application of the law. Dean v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 535 NW2d 342, 343 (Minn.1995). Here, the underlying facts are not disputed. ...

Peterka v. Dennis

... Mary Catherine Lauhead, Law Offices of Mary Catherine Lauhead, St. Paul, Minnesota; Michael D. Dittberner, Clugg, Linder, Dittberner & Bryant, Ltd., Edina, Minnesota; Cheryl M. Prince, Hanft Fride, PA, Duluth, Minnesota; and Joan H. Lucas, Lucas Family Law, LLC, St. ...

Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp.

... Divorce law and domestic relations law are traditionally matters of state concern. ... See 29 USC Â§ 1056(d)(1) (2006). Thus, the rights a former spouse or dependent may claim under a QDRO arise, not under ERISA, but under state domestic relations law and the terms of the plan. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Warroad Family Law Lawyer, Minnesota

Sponsored Law Firm

Wiscota Law and Mediation PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Steven Axel Anderson

Steven Axel Anderson

Nora Linne Crumpton

Steven A. Anderson

Steven Axel Anderson

Kristy Rae Kjos

Harold G Myhre

Joseph A Harren

Donna Kay Dixon

Michael Patrick Grover

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INTERLOCUTORY DECREE

DILUTION

IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES

DIVORCE AGREEMENT

CRUELTY

GROUNDS FOR DIVORCE

MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE

GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE

BRIEF

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Do v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co.

Peterka v. Dennis

Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details