Wayzata DUI-DWI Lawyer, Minnesota

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard Morris
About | Practice Areas
Morris Law Group PA
7380 France Ave S. Suite 250 Edina, MN 55435» view map
Criminal Defense Law
We Are Experts In What We Do

Whether it’s your home or business, you are important to us. Reach out today to set up a meeting with one of our experienced Edina lawyers.

800-872-9610
1. Richard Morris Edina, MN
  Attorney at Law- MN, 1974
  William Mitchell College of Law, J.D.
2. AboutMorris Law Group PA
  We Are Experts In What We Do
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

James M Ventura

Criminal, Traffic, DUI-DWI, Felony

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr, Wayzata, MN 55391

James M Ventura

Education, Income Tax, Traffic, Criminal, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

1000 Twelve Oaks Center, Wayzata, MN 55391

Emily Mary Peterson

Litigation, Employee Rights, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

90 South 7Th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402

Michele G Greer

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

801 Twelve Oaks Center Dr, Wayzata, MN 55391

Michael Norman Heinrich

Traffic, Divorce, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

10 Lakeview Avenue, Excelsior, MN 55331

Paul B Ahern

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

5101 Thimsen Avenue, Minnetonka, MN 55345

Heidi Elisabeth Viesturs

DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

17800 Excelsior Boulevard, Minnetonka, MN 55345

Jeffrey B Ring

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

19625 Sweetwater Curve, Excelsior, MN 55331

Thomas E Bauer

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

14225 Highway 55, Minneapolis, MN 55447

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Underdahl

... OPINION. MEYER, Justice. Dale Lee Underdahl and Timothy Arlen Brunner (appellants) each sought discovery of the complete computer source code for the Minnesota model of the Intoxilyzer 5000EN in their separate driving while intoxicated (DWI) criminal prosecutions. ...

Reeves v. Commissioner of Public Safety

... [*]. Appellant Daniel Joseph Reeves challenges the district court order sustaining the revocation of his driving privileges, arguing that (1) since he did not fail the preliminary breath test (PBT), there was no probable cause for his arrest for driving while impaired (DWI) and (2 ...

State v. Eller

... On appeal from his conviction for gross-misdemeanor driving while impaired (DWI)â€”refusal to submit to a chemical test and gross-misdemeanor assault following a stipulated-facts trial, appellant argues (1) the evidence was insufficient to find that appellant had a prior DWI ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Wayzata DUI-DWI Lawyer, Minnesota

Sponsored Law Firm

Morris Law Group PA

SPONSORED LAWYERS

James M Ventura

James M Ventura

Emily Mary Peterson

Michele G Greer

Michael Norman Heinrich

Paul B Ahern

Heidi Elisabeth Viesturs

Jeffrey B Ring

Thomas E Bauer

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BURGLARY

INFORMED CONSENT

PROBABLE CAUSE

HABEAS CORPUS

DIRECTED VERDICT

MOTION IN LIMINE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Underdahl

Reeves v. Commissioner of Public Safety

State v. Eller

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details