Woodbury Criminal Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Andrew Amendola
About | Practice Areas
Andrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law
591 Thompson Avenue East Haven, CT 06512» view map
Accident & Injury, Criminal, Estate, Real Estate
Where Every Client Matters

Let Andrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law handle all your legal needs today@

800-942-4780
1. Andrew Amendola East Haven, CT
  Attorney at Law, CT
2. AboutAndrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law
  Where Every Client Matters
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury, Criminal, Estate, Real Estate
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

James William Cummings

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Business, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Workers' Compensation

At your side, on your side, every step of the way Respected personal, family, business and general practice lawyer James W. Cummings stands by his ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-578-4650

21 Holmes Avenue, Waterbury, CT 06710

Thomas J. Piscatelli

Family Law, Real Estate, Litigation, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

520 South Main Street (Route 63), Naugatuck, CT 06770

William L. Stevens

Landlord-Tenant, Arbitration, Criminal, Administrative Law, Animal Bite

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

27 Siemon Company Drive, Oakville, CT 06795

Valerie C Ferrucci

Commercial Real Estate, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

216 Davis Street, Oakville, CT 06779

Fanol Bojka

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Personal Injury, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

49 Leavenworth Street, Waterbury, CT 06702

Robert C Lubus

Alimony & Spousal Support, Criminal, Banking & Finance, Animal Bite

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

86 Buckingham Street, Waterbury, CT 06710

Ioannis A. Kaloidis

Commercial Real Estate, Workers' Compensation, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

580 Watertown Avenue, Waterbury, CT 06708

David Vincent Derosa

Other, Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

42 Terrace Ave, Naugatuck, CT 06770

James A Saraceni

Criminal, Business & Trade, Administrative Law, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Hawleyville, CT 06440

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

BAILOR

Someone who delivers an item of personal property to another person for a specific purpose. For example, a person who leaves a broken VCR with a repairman in or... (more...)

Someone who delivers an item of personal property to another person for a specific purpose. For example, a person who leaves a broken VCR with a repairman in order to get it fixed would be a bailor.

INFRACTION

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, ho... (more...)

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, however--refusing to identify oneself when involved in an accident is a misdemeanor in some states.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. TD

... to 2003) Â§ 54-251 and General Statutes Â§ 54-257. After a hearing, the trial court found that, because the defendant had failed to register as a sex offender, he had violated the condition of his probation that required him to not violate any criminal law. ...

State v. DeJesus

... we will maintain the liberal standard, but do so as a limited exception to the prohibition on the admission of uncharged misconduct evidence in sexual assault cases to prove that the defendant had a propensity to engage in aberrant and compulsive criminal sexual behavior. ...

State v. Salamon

... In accordance with these principles, we have not hesitated to revisit and overrule our prior holdings, including prior holdings applicable to criminal matters; see, eg, State v. Skakel, supra, at 693, 888 A.2d 985; State v. Miranda, supra, at 733-34, 878 A.2d 1118; State v. Colon ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Woodbury Criminal Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm

Andrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

James William Cummings

Thomas J. Piscatelli

William L. Stevens

Valerie C Ferrucci

Fanol Bojka

Robert C Lubus

Ioannis A. Kaloidis

David Vincent Derosa

James A Saraceni

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

CRIMINAL LAW

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

BAILOR

INFRACTION

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

HABEAS CORPUS

PLEA

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. TD

State v. DeJesus

State v. Salamon

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details