Blanding Criminal Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:
Michael Hepworth
Tyler Call | Tanner Clagett
Hepworth & Associates
Serving all of Utah » view map
Utah Criminal Lawyers
Things Get Better From Here

Providing professional and compassionate representation in various criminal cases. Hepworth & Associates are tough, strong and fair attorneys.

800-625-0860
1. Michael Hepworth Bountiful, UT
  Attorney At Law - Utah
  Sturm College of Law, J.D. - 2014
2. Tyler Call Bountiful, UT
  Attorney At Law - UT, 2015
  U of Oregon, J.D. - 2014
3. M. Tanner Clagett Bountiful, UT
  Attorney At Law - UT, 2016
  U of Denver, J.D. - 2014
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Blanding Criminal lawyer.
Below are all Blanding lawyers.

Craig C Halls

Real Estate, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

403 S Main St, Blanding, UT 84511

Kendall Grant Laws

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

417 W 100 S, Blanding, UT 84511

L. Robert Anderson

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 70 Years

CONTACT

81 East 100 South, Monticello, UT 84535

Daniel G Anderson

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

81 East 100 South, Monticello, UT 84535

Lyle R Anderson

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

280 S Silverstone Lane, Monticello, UT 84535

Steven Phillip Simpson

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

913 E Navajo Twins Dr, Bluff, UT 84512

Edward Macdonald Dobson

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

Mexican Hat, UT 84531

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Salt Lake City v. Bench

... 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)). It is initially justified if a police officer has a reasonable suspicion, prior to the stop, that a person is engaging in, or has engaged in, criminal behavior. See id.; Utah Code Ann. ... 2. Details About the Observed Criminal Conduct. ...

State v. Lane

... 4 On July 15, 2005, criminal charges were filed against Lane, including two counts of negligent homicide, a class A misdemeanor. ... 16 A victim is not a party to a criminal case and is not afforded the right to appeal the dismissal of a criminal judgment. ...

State v. Valdez

... BILLINGS, Judge: Â¶ 1 Defendant Patrick Henry Valdez was charged in five different informations based on separate criminal episodes with two second degree felonies, four third degree felonies, and seven misdemeanors, primarily related to various burglaries. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Blanding Criminal Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

Hepworth & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Craig C Halls

Kendall Grant Laws

L. Robert Anderson

Daniel G Anderson

Lyle R Anderson

Steven Phillip Simpson

Edward Macdonald Dobson

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

WARRANT

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

SELF-INCRIMINATION

MOTION IN LIMINE

INSANITY

ASSAULT

SELF-DEFENSE

INTERROGATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Salt Lake City v. Bench

State v. Lane

State v. Valdez

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details