Bridgewater Tax Lawyer, Connecticut


Bryan V. Doto

Tax, Real Estate, Estate Planning, Corporate
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  21 Years

Martin J Gersten

Tax, Securities, Corporate, Business
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  43 Years

Brian George Waterman

Tax, Tax Litigation, Wills, Estate Planning
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  14 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Lawyer.com can help you easily and quickly find Bridgewater Tax Lawyers and Bridgewater Tax Law Firms. Refine your search by specific Tax practice areas such as Corporate Tax, Income Tax, Sales & Use Tax and Tax Litigation matters.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Boczer v. Sella

... [3]. Following a hearing pursuant to Practice Book § 18-5, [4] the clerk entered an order of taxation on August 29, 2006, and awarded the defendants $23,935.17. The plaintiff subsequently filed a motion for review of the order of taxation on September 6, 2006. ...

Aspetuck Land Trust v. City of Bridgeport

... Marsh Island (island). The plaintiff's complaint alleged that it owned the property on October 1, 2005, and that the assessor had determined that the property was liable for taxation for the tax year 33 2005. The plaintiff alleged ...

Rainforest Cafe v. Dept. of Revenue

... would result in a requirement that a taxpayer that contracts with a "retailer engaged in business in this state" that is also a "nonresident contractor" would be required to pay the applicable sales and use tax twice, an absurd result, for it is well established that double taxation is a ...