Brookfield Discrimination Lawyer, Connecticut


Includes: Race Discrimination, Religious Discrimination

Mariel Ann Harris

Health Care Other, Elder Law, Disability, Medical Malpractice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  27 Years

Cindy Robinson

Disability, Products Liability, Personal Injury, Legal Malpractice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Brookfield Discrimination Lawyers and Brookfield Discrimination Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Civil & Human Rights areas including Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Elder Law and Native People attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health

... The defendants also asserted that our statutory scheme does not discriminate on the basis of sex because, inter alia, it does not single out men or women as a class for disparate treatment, the touchstone of any sex discrimination claim. ... A. History of Discrimination. ...

Fillion v. Hannon

... "The [e]qual [p]rotection [c]lause requires that the government treat all similarly situated people alike. . . . Although the prototypical equal protection claim involves discrimination against people based on their membership in a vulnerable class . . . ...

State v. Holloway

... 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986)] the United States Supreme Court recognized that a claim of purposeful racial discrimination on the part of the prosecution in selecting a jury raises constitutional questions of the utmost seriousness, not only for the integrity of a particular trial ...