Chase Juvenile Law Lawyer, Louisiana

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Stephen Babcock
About | Practice Areas
Babcock Trial Lawyers
10101 Siegen Ln #3-C Baton Rouge, LA 70810» view map
Criminal Defense
We Want Your Injury Claim PAID NOW!

At Babcock Trial Lawyers, we work for our clients, maintaining our reputation of excellence as criminal defense & personal injury lawyers in Baton Rouge.

225-500-5000
1. Stephen Babcock Baton Rouge, LA
  Attorney at Law- LA, 2000
  Paul M. Hebert Law Center, J.D.
2. AboutBabcock Trial Lawyers
  100% Client satisfaction guarantee
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Chase Juvenile Law lawyer.
Below are all Chase Criminal lawyers.

Gregory George Elias

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Social Security, Lawsuit, Criminal

Greg Elias loves to try cases. He is also highly regarded among Monroe divorce law attorneys as being a skillful Monroe divorce lawyer. You can depend... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-919-0510

300 Washington St, Monroe, LA 71201

Bobby Ray Manning

Juvenile Law, Other, Criminal, Personal Injury, Workers' Compensation

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

320 Pine St, Monroe, LA 71201

Susan Elizabeth Skidmore

Family Law, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

3016 Cameron St, Monroe, LA 71201

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

CRIMINAL CASE

A lawsuit brought by a prosecutor employed by the federal, state or local government that charges a person with the commission of a crime.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Chase Juvenile Law Lawyer, Louisiana

Sponsored Law Firm

Babcock Trial Lawyers

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Gregory George Elias

Bobby Ray Manning

Susan Elizabeth Skidmore

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

SELF-DEFENSE

SEARCH WARRANT

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

ARREST WARRANT

CRIMINAL INSANITY

CRIMINAL CASE

JURY NULLIFICATION

SELF-INCRIMINATION

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details