Cody Discrimination Lawyer, Nebraska


Includes: Race Discrimination, Religious Discrimination

Kurt Dam Arganbright

Labor Law, Family Law, Business & Trade, Products Liability
Status:  In Good Standing           

Warren R. Arganbright

Other, Agriculture, Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Banking & Finance
Status:  In Good Standing           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Cody Discrimination Lawyers and Cody Discrimination Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Civil & Human Rights areas including Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Elder Law and Native People attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Thorpe

... [6] Third, the trial court then determines whether the defendant has carried his or her burden of proving purposeful discrimination. ... Under this circumstance, whether Thorpe made a prima facie showing of purposeful discrimination is moot. ...

State v. Thorpe

... [6] Third, the trial court then determines whether the defendant has carried his or her burden of proving purposeful discrimination. ... Under this circumstance, whether Thorpe made a prima facie showing of purposeful discrimination is moot. ...

State v. Sanders

... A trial court's determination of whether a party has established purposeful discrimination in jury selection is a finding of fact and is entitled to appropriate deference from an appellate court because such a finding will largely turn on evaluations of credibility. ...