Coolin Criminal Lawyer, Idaho

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Michael Waldrup
About | Practice Areas
Waldrup Law Office
105 N First Ave. P.O. Box 2659 Sandpoint, ID 83864» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Experience & Integrity You Can Trust

Whether you are a first timer or have prior charges or convictions the lawyer you choose is of the utmost importance. Let me worry about the details.

800-957-6511
1. Michael Waldrup Sandpoint, ID
  Attorney at Law - ID, 1999
  University of Idaho J.D. 1998
2. AboutWaldrup Law Office
  Sandpoint, Idaho Attorney who will protect your rights.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Michael Waldrup

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Divorce, Child Custody

Michael D. Waldrup is an experienced trial lawyer and has practiced extensively in the area of Criminal Law as both a Deputy Prosecuting Attorney and ... (more)

CONTACT

800-957-6511

105 N First Ave., Sandpoint, ID 83864

Kenneth Paul Adler

Criminal, Family Law, Litigation

Status: Inactive Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

421 Gold Creek Road, Sandpoint, ID 83864

James Theodore Diehl

Family Law, Criminal, Civil Rights, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

106 Superior St, Sandpoint, ID 83864

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Yakovac

... III. ANALYSIS. This case presents issues on direct appeal from the criminal proceeding and issues on appeal from the post-conviction relief action. ... 1. Applicable Legal Standard. A post-conviction relief petition initiates a civil, rather than criminal, proceeding. ...

Pizzuto v. State

... He also filed a motion under Rule 35 of the Idaho Criminal Rules to correct an illegal sentence, alleging that under Ring his sentence was illegal because a judge rather than a jury had made the factual findings upon which imposition of the death penalty was based. ...

State v. Bishop

... 690, 694-95, 66 L.Ed.2d 621, 628-29 (1981). An informant's tip regarding suspected criminal activity may give rise to reasonable suspicion when it would "warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that a stop was appropriate." White, 496 US at 329, 110 S.Ct. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Coolin Criminal Lawyer, Idaho

Sponsored Law Firm

Waldrup Law Office

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Michael Waldrup

Kenneth Paul Adler

James Theodore Diehl

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

NOLO CONTENDERE

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

DIRECTED VERDICT

LARCENY

INSANITY

CONVICTION

ACTUS REUS

IMPEACH

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Yakovac

Pizzuto v. State

State v. Bishop

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details