David Ruiz | Tucson Business Lawyer
Top Local Lawyers
Natasha Wrae
Natasha Wrae PC
Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor,
312 S 3rd Ave
Tucson, AZ 85701
Michelle Lynn Behan
Behan Ramsell PLLC
Criminal, White Collar Crime, Felony, Misdemeanor,
1 S. Church Ave Suite 1200
Tucson, AZ 85701
Robert J. Weber
Robert J. Weber, P.C.
Estate,
1839 East Queen Creek Road Suite #1
Chandler, AZ 85286
Simon A. Kubiak
Walk-In-Wills PC
Estate, Wills & Probate, Estate Planning, Trusts,
1095 W. Queen Creek Rd Suite 4
Chandler, AZ 85248
Mark Atchley
Atchley Law Firm, PLC
Bankruptcy & Debt, Estate,
7255 E Hampton Ave Building 4, Suite 127
Mesa, AZ 85209
Walter E Moak
The Moak Law Firm
Bankruptcy & Debt, Bankruptcy,
1820 E Ray Rd
Chandler, AZ 85225
Joseph Stanley Martineau
Martineau Law, PLLC
Accident & Injury, Medical Malpractice, Nursing Home, Estate, Children's Rights
4445 E Holmes Ave Suite 106
Mesa, AZ 85206
Manny A Jacobo
Jacobo Law Firm, PLLC
Criminal, General Practice, Felony, Traffic,
3133 W Frye Rd Suite 101
Chandler, AZ 85226
Kevin L. Jensen
Genesis Family Law and Divorce Lawyers
Divorce & Family Law, Family Law, Litigation,
2915 E Baseline Rd Suite 115
Gilbert, AZ 85234
About David
Call today to learn more about my fee structure.
Experience
Attorney
Munger, Chadwick, & Denker, P.L.C.
Present
Tucson, AZ
Admission
Arizona
2013
California
2010
Education
James E. Rogers College of Law, University of Arizona
LL.M.
2011
Recognitions & Achievements
-
Member | Arizona State Bar Association
-
Super Lawyers, Rising Stars2015 - 2019
-
Lawyers of Distinction /, Corporate and Transactional2015 / 2016
-
Global Chamber of Commerce, Global Legal Leader of the Year2018
Notable Work
Rash v. Town of. Mammoth, 233 Ariz. 577, 315 P.3d 1234 (App. 2013).
HOLDINGS: [1]-It was an abuse of discretion to dismiss an officer's Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-1004 special action contesting his firing by applying the Ariz. R. Civ. App. P. 9(a) 30-day time limit through Ariz. R.P. Spec. Actions 7(i) because Ariz. R.P. Spec. Actions 7 did not apply; [2]-Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-904(A) did not require dismissal because it did not apply to decisions of appellee town or appellee county employee merit system commission (Commission), Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-1004 provided a definite judicial review procedure, and Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-901 et seq., did not apply to special actions under Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-1004(A); [3]-A dismissal under laches was an abuse of discretion because no unreasonable delay was found and nothing showed prejudice; [4]-Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-1004 provided subject matter jurisdiction because the officer clearly contested the Commission's acts.
Additional Info
Munger, Chadwick & Denker, P.L.C. Highlights
Real Estate, Business, Environmental Law Other