David Ruiz | Tucson Business Lawyer

Top Local Lawyers
Natasha Wrae
Natasha Wrae PC
Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor,
312 S 3rd Ave
Tucson, AZ 85701
John Keller Hilton
Law Offices of John K. Hilton PLC
Employment, Business, Employee Rights, Estate, Government Agencies
1011 N 6th Ave
Tucson, AZ 85705
Michelle Lynn Behan
Behan Ramsell PLLC
Criminal, White Collar Crime, Felony, Misdemeanor,
1 S. Church Ave Suite 1200
Tucson, AZ 85701
Robert J. Weber
Robert J. Weber, P.C.
Estate,
1839 East Queen Creek Road Suite #1
Chandler, AZ 85286
Mark Atchley
Atchley Law Firm, PLC
Bankruptcy & Debt, Estate,
7255 E Hampton Ave Building 4, Suite 127
Mesa, AZ 85209
Walter E Moak
The Moak Law Firm
Bankruptcy & Debt, Bankruptcy,
1820 E Ray Rd
Chandler, AZ 85225
Joseph Stanley Martineau
Martineau Law, PLLC
Accident & Injury, Medical Malpractice, Nursing Home, Estate, Children's Rights
4445 E Holmes Ave Suite 106
Mesa, AZ 85206
Manny A Jacobo
Jacobo Law Firm, PLLC
Criminal, General Practice, Felony, Traffic,
3133 W Frye Rd Suite 101
Chandler, AZ 85226
Kevin L. Jensen
Genesis Family Law and Divorce Lawyers
Divorce & Family Law, Family Law, Litigation,
2915 E Baseline Rd Suite 115
Gilbert, AZ 85234
About David
Call today to learn more about my fee structure.
Experience
Attorney
Munger, Chadwick, & Denker, P.L.C.
Present
Tucson, AZ
Admission
Arizona
2013
California
2010
Education
Thomas M. Cooley Law School
J.D. (International Law)
2010
University of Michigan
B.A.
2005
University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law
LL.M. (International Trade and Business Law)
06/2011
Recognitions & Achievements
-
Member | Arizona State Bar Association
-
Super Lawyers, Rising Stars2015 - 2019
-
Lawyers of Distinction /, Corporate and Transactional2015 / 2016
-
Global Chamber of Commerce, Global Legal Leader of the Year2018
Notable Work
Rash v. Town of. Mammoth, 233 Ariz. 577, 315 P.3d 1234 (App. 2013).
HOLDINGS: [1]-It was an abuse of discretion to dismiss an officer's Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-1004 special action contesting his firing by applying the Ariz. R. Civ. App. P. 9(a) 30-day time limit through Ariz. R.P. Spec. Actions 7(i) because Ariz. R.P. Spec. Actions 7 did not apply; [2]-Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-904(A) did not require dismissal because it did not apply to decisions of appellee town or appellee county employee merit system commission (Commission), Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-1004 provided a definite judicial review procedure, and Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-901 et seq., did not apply to special actions under Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-1004(A); [3]-A dismissal under laches was an abuse of discretion because no unreasonable delay was found and nothing showed prejudice; [4]-Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-1004 provided subject matter jurisdiction because the officer clearly contested the Commission's acts.
Additional Info
Munger, Chadwick & Denker, P.L.C. Highlights
Real Estate, Business, Environmental Law Other