Duchesne County, UT Juvenile Law Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:
Michael Hepworth
Tyler Call | Tanner Clagett
Hepworth & Associates
Serving all of Utah » view map
Utah Criminal Lawyers
Things Get Better From Here

Providing professional and compassionate representation in various criminal cases. Hepworth & Associates are tough, strong and fair attorneys.

800-625-0860
1. Michael Hepworth Bountiful, UT
  Attorney At Law - Utah
  Sturm College of Law, J.D. - 2014
2. Tyler Call Bountiful, UT
  Attorney At Law - UT, 2015
  U of Oregon, J.D. - 2014
3. M. Tanner Clagett Bountiful, UT
  Attorney At Law - UT, 2016
  U of Denver, J.D. - 2014
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Duchesne Juvenile Law lawyer.
Below are all Duchesne lawyers.

Bradley Brotherson

Landlord-Tenant, Adoption, Divorce & Family Law, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

72 N 300 E St, Roosevelt, UT 84066

Herbert William Gillespie

Divorce & Family Law, Foreign Investment

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

45 E. 100 N, Roosevelt, UT 84066

Samuel P Chiara

Government

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

255 South State, Roosevelt, UT 84066

Stephen D Foote

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

21554 W 9000 S, Duchesne, UT 84021

Tyler C Allred

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

734 North Center Street, Duchesne, UT 84021

Duane W Moss

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

Hc 63, Fruitland, UT 84027

Keith E Eddington

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

1040 West 190 South, Roosevelt, UT 84066

Joel D Berrett

Litigation

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

58 East 100 North, Roosevelt, UT 84066

Roland F Uresk

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

47 North 200 East, Roosevelt, UT 84066

James R Hall

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 74 Years

CONTACT

411 E 200 N, Roosevelt, UT 84066

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

STATE EX REL. KF

... meaningful appellate review. I. THE JUVENILE COURT HAD SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. ... A. There Was Sufficient Evidence for the Juvenile Court to Determine That the Mother Failed to Comply With Her Service Plan. Â¶ 45 At the ...

Whitney v. DIV. OF JUVENILE JUSTICE SERV.

Â¶ 4 At the hearing, the juvenile court directed Juvenile Services to perform an observation and assessment of Dillon. The juvenile court later ordered Juvenile Services to transfer Dillon to a community-based placement. Juvenile Services placed Dillon in the community-based ...

STATE EX REL. ACM

... II. THE JUVENILE COURT HAD JURISDICTION TO HEAR THE PETITION TO TERMINATE MR. NUOSCI'S PARENTAL RIGHTS. ... IV. THE JUVENILE COURT STATED LEGALLY SUFFICIENT GROUNDS TO TERMINATE MR. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Duchesne County, UT Juvenile Law Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

Hepworth & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Bradley Brotherson

Herbert William Gillespie

Samuel P Chiara

Stephen D Foote

Tyler C Allred

Duane W Moss

Keith E Eddington

Joel D Berrett

Roland F Uresk

James R Hall

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MISTRIAL

DIRECTED VERDICT

BURDEN OF PROOF

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

GRAND JURY

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

LARCENY

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

JURY NULLIFICATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

STATE EX REL. KF

Whitney v. DIV. OF JUVENILE JUSTICE SERV.

STATE EX REL. ACM

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details