Enumclaw Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Karim A. Hamir
About | Practice Areas
The Cowlitz Law Group
111 W Columbia Way Suite 246 Vancouver, WA 98660» view map
Estate Law
Highly Trained & Engaged Professionals

The Cowlitz Law Group PLLC is a successful practice that is built upon providing its clients with personal service, measurable results that meet or exceed expectations.

800-957-9250
1. Karim A. Hamir Vancouver, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 2003
  Western Michigan University J.D.
2. AboutThe Cowlitz Law Group
  We earn the right to be the client's first choice!
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Estate Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Krista Colleen White-Swain

Criminal, Private Judging

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

Enumclaw, WA 98022

Richard G. Welch

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 56 Years

CONTACT

Enumclaw, WA 98022

Richard Willis Bathum

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

46905 283Rd Ave Se, Enumclaw, WA 98022

P. Gail Crawford

Federal, Estate Planning, Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

2010 Park St, Enumclaw, WA 98022

Barry Christopher Kombol

Estate, Accident & Injury, Criminal, Business

Status:

CONTACT

31615 Third Ave, Black Diamond, WA 98010

Thomas Ray Hargan

Municipal, Government, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

Black Diamond, WA 98010

Tom L. Moore

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

25504 Cumberland Way, Black Diamond, WA 98010

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

... The Court of Appeals in each case held that the sentencing court improperly relied upon the State's assertion of the defendant's criminal history where the defendant did not stipulate to the criminal history and the State did not provide any evidence to establish the prior ...

State v. Momah

... 10 Article I, section 10 provides that "[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly." The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant the right to a "public trial by an impartial jury ...

State v. Codiga

... 2 Discovery of additional criminal history, rather than legal error, caused the increased offender score in this case. Codiga's ... form. Â¶ 5 The plea form also lists the prosecuting attorney's statement of Codiga's criminal history. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Enumclaw Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

The Cowlitz Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Krista Colleen White-Swain

Richard G. Welch

Richard Willis Bathum

P. Gail Crawford

Barry Christopher Kombol

Thomas Ray Hargan

Tom L. Moore

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

LINEUP

MENS REA

CIVIL

GRAND JURY

INSANITY

FEDERAL COURT

PROSECUTE

ASSAULT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

State v. Momah

State v. Codiga

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS