Ephraim Felony Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gregory Smith
About | Practice Areas
Greg Smith and Associates
7324 Union Park Ave Suite 101 Midvale, UT 84047Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Proudly Serving The State of Utah

We've successfully resolved thousands of criminal defense and other cases, and we can take your call now!

800-925-8751
1. Gregory Smith Midvale, UT
  Attorney at Law - UT, 1993
  Brigham Young University J.D. 1993
2. AboutGreg Smith and Associates
  Over 25 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Ephraim Felony lawyer.
Below are all Ephraim lawyers.

Douglas L Neeley

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Mass Torts, Juvenile Law, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

501 South Main Street, Ephraim, UT 84627

Ted S. Meikle

Government

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

932 S 950 E, Ephraim, UT 84627

Niel H. Lund

Adoption, Divorce, Child Custody, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

40 N Main St, Manti, UT 84642

Thomas C Anderson

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 54 Years

CONTACT

356 East 200 South, Ephraim, UT 84627

Emily D Peterson

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

150 E. College Avenue, Ephraim, UT 84627

Bryan Keisel

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

665 East 200 South, Manti, UT 84642

Kevin L Daniels

Juvenile Law, Commercial Real Estate, Employee Rights, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

160 N. Main Street, Manti, UT 84642

Linda J Barclay

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

212 South 300 West, Manti, UT 84642

David S Tibbs

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

55 S Main St Ste 22, Manti, UT 84642

Phillip M. Allred

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

71 E 4005, Ephraim, UT 84627

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

Ephraim Felony Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

Greg Smith and Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Douglas L Neeley

Ted S. Meikle

Niel H. Lund

Thomas C Anderson

Emily D Peterson

Bryan Keisel

Kevin L Daniels

Linda J Barclay

David S Tibbs

Phillip M. Allred

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

GRAND JURY

BURGLARY

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

JURY NULLIFICATION

ASSAULT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

ARREST

SELF-INCRIMINATION

CIVIL

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details