Fairmont RICO Act Lawyer, Minnesota

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard L. Cooper
About | Services
The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.
848 Brickell Avenue Suite 800 Miami, FL 33131Â» view map
DWI/DUI, Drug Trafficking, Felony
Nationally Ranked Top 40 Under 40

With Richard L. Cooper you can expect a trusted confidant who will work diligently to fully understand your case and determine a road map to help you regain control of your life.

800-756-2781
1. Richard L. Cooper Miami, FL
  Attorney at Law - FL, 2011
  Nova Southeastern University, J.D.
2. AboutMiami Attorney at Law
  Covering all Felonies and Misdemeanors including drugs, theft, DUI, probation violations, and much more.
3. ServicesCriminal Defense
  We know that being faced with a serious criminal charge is frightening.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Video
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Fairmont RICO Act lawyer.
Below are all Fairmont Criminal lawyers.

Mary Jo Moltzen

State Government, Government, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

210 E 3Rd St, Fairmont, MN 56031

Michael P. Kircher

Business Organization, Civil Rights, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

108 Armstrong Blvd South, Saint James, MN 56081

Christophe A Butzon

Agriculture, Family Law, Wills & Probate, Criminal, Estate

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

603 Second St, Jackson, MN 56143

Christopher M Kennedy

Traffic, Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

99 Navaho Ave, Mankato, MN 56001

Christopher M. Kennedy

Alimony & Spousal Support, Criminal, Bankruptcy, Animal Bite, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

99 Navaho Avenue, Mankato, MN 56001

Christopher Michael Kennedy

Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt, Animal Bite, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

99 Navaho Avenue, Mankato, MN 56001

Patrick Casey

Family Law, Divorce, Child Custody, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

196 St Andrews Dr, Mankato, MN 56001

Marcus J Christianson

Social Security, Government, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

151 Saint Andrews Court, Mankato, MN 56001

Christopher Paul Rosengren

Social Security, Workers' Compensation, Criminal, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

150 St Andrews Ct, Mankato, MN 56001

Patrick Joseph Casey

Family Law, Divorce, Child Custody, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

196 St Andrews Dr, Mankato, MN 56001

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

INFORMATION

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or ... (more...)

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or a misdemeanor. The information tells the defendant what crime he is charged with, against whom and when the offense allegedly occurred, but the prosecutor is not obliged to go into great detail. If the defendant wants more specifics, he must ask for it by way of a discovery request. Compare indictment.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Fairmont RICO Act Lawyer, Minnesota

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Mary Jo Moltzen

Michael P. Kircher

Christophe A Butzon

Christopher M Kennedy

Christopher M. Kennedy

Christopher Michael Kennedy

Patrick Casey

Marcus J Christianson

Christopher Paul Rosengren

Patrick Joseph Casey

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CIVIL

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

SELF-DEFENSE

INFORMATION

BURDEN OF PROOF

ARREST

ACQUITTAL

DIRECTED VERDICT

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details