Federalsburg Criminal Lawyer, Maryland

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:
Charles L. Waechter
Video Center | Contact Us
Law Offices of Charles L. Waechter
1435 Sulphur Spring Road 1st Floor Baltimore, MD 21227 » view map
Maryland Criminal Law
The Premiere Criminal Defense Firm

Child Pornography and Criminal Attorney Serving Clients throughout Maryland. Contact today for swift and professional council, your future is on the line.

800-654-7381
1. Charles Waechter Baltimore, MD
  Attorney At Law - MD, 1985
  University of Baltimore SOL, J.D. - 1985
2. Video Center
  Click here for our firms introductory video and video center.
3. Contact UsEmail or Call 24/7
  Call today for your initial evaluation
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Rene' C Swafford

Criminal, Family Law, Traffic, Juvenile Law

Status: Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

332 N Main St, Federalsburg, MD 21632

René C. Swafford

Traffic, Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

Denton, MD 21629

Robert Alan Thornton

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Traffic

Status:

CONTACT

118 Market St, Denton, MD 21629

Timothy Andrew Bradford

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

Denton, MD 21629

Carlie Marie Bloxom Spear

Criminal, Family Law

Status: Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

305 Academy Ave, Denton, MD 21629

Nicholas Taylor Iliff

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

104 Franklin St, Denton, MD 21629

Philip C Foster

Government, Estate, Criminal, Trusts

Status:

CONTACT

Easton, MD 21601

Stephanie A. Shipley

Criminal, DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime

Status: Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

10 W Dover St, Easton, MD 21601

Stephanie Ann Shipley

Accident & Injury, Insurance, Criminal, Litigation, Traffic

Status:

CONTACT

10 W Dover St, Easton, MD 21601

Scott Grove Patterson

Other, Landlord-Tenant, Criminal, Traffic

Status: Licensed: 54 Years

CONTACT

20 N West St, Easton, MD 21601

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

BOOKING

A quaint phrase that refers to the recording of an arrested person's name, age, address and reason for arrest when that person is brought to jail and placed beh... (more...)

A quaint phrase that refers to the recording of an arrested person's name, age, address and reason for arrest when that person is brought to jail and placed behind bars. Nowadays, the book is likely to be a computer. Usually, a mug shot and fingerprints are taken, and the arrestee's clothing and personal effects are inventoried and stored.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

BAILOR

Someone who delivers an item of personal property to another person for a specific purpose. For example, a person who leaves a broken VCR with a repairman in or... (more...)

Someone who delivers an item of personal property to another person for a specific purpose. For example, a person who leaves a broken VCR with a repairman in order to get it fixed would be a bailor.

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Opert v. Criminal Injuries

The Criminal Injuries Compensation law, now codified in Â§Â§ 11-801 through 11-819 of the Criminal Procedure Article (CP), was enacted in 1968 for the purpose of enabling innocent victims of certain crimes to receive State-funded compensation for physical injury sustained by them as a ...

Price v. State

... JOHN C. ELDRIDGE, Judge (Retired, Specially Assigned). In this criminal case, we granted the defendant's petition for a writ of certiorari to re-examine the Maryland common law principle that inconsistent jury verdicts are normally permissible in criminal jury trials. ...

Neal v. Criminal Injuries Compensation Board

On November 4, 2004, Mr. Neal filed a Crime Victims' Compensation Application with the Board and sought to recover for medical expenses and the disability he incurred as a result of the assault. On November 30, 2004, the Board denied his claim for compensation because, it ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Federalsburg Criminal Lawyer, Maryland

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices of Charles L. Waechter

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Rene' C Swafford

René C. Swafford

Robert Alan Thornton

Timothy Andrew Bradford

Carlie Marie Bloxom Spear

Nicholas Taylor Iliff

Philip C Foster

Stephanie A. Shipley

Stephanie Ann Shipley

Scott Grove Patterson

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-INCRIMINATION

BOOKING

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

JURY NULLIFICATION

BAILOR

SENTENCE

JURY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CHARGE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Opert v. Criminal Injuries

Price v. State

Neal v. Criminal Injuries Compensation Board

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS