Glen Norton | Minnetonka Divorce Lawyer

Glen A. Norton

Glen A. Norton

Divorce and Child Custody Attorney

Experience: 39 years
Language(s): English

Top Local Lawyers

About Glen

We take the time to care about our clients. Family law cases are difficult because they relate to our most emotional issues of children and relationships. In times of high emotion, we give the client the help and advice he or she needs that acknowledges the upsetting facts without being blinded by them. We believe our faith directs us not to be judgmental about your situation.
We work in the Collaborative Process, in mediation or traditional family court litigation. Specifically, we help people who have divorce, child custody, domestic violence, spousal maintenance, child support, and other family law cases anywhere in Minnesota. We have appeared in 35 of the 87 counties in Minnesota. With over 30 years’ experience we focus upon cases in Hennepin County, Anoka County, Wright County, and Sherburne County.
Sometimes when people are going into a divorce or child custody case they feel they only need a little help, while others know they will need a lot of help. We offer a flat fee Preliminary Case Analysis for $275.00. In that meeting, which lasts 1.5 hours, we look at all the papers there are so far, and we look at all the apparent issues. We discuss family court procedure, strategy and what we can do to help you. Custody cases can be surprisingly complicated. The right result is very important for your children. We will tell you if we think you should attempt representing yourself, and if so, how to do that well. After the meeting, if you want to hire us for more than the analysis, you can sign the fee agreement, pay a retainer and we will be on your case.  If you decide to do it yourself, you can do that too. We also offer a Free Initial half hour Consultation. In this meeting we introduce ourselves, go over the big issues and the basics of the law relating to your case. We will exchange less information, but we will both come away from the meeting knowing if we could work together or not. We do not take every potential client. Sometimes we have too many complex matters to undertake another, sometimes we do not feel we are a fit as a team or financially. Sometimes we won’t take a case because we do not want the court to be apprehensive when our next client after that comes into court with us. We seek to represent diverse people and an equal number of men and women for similar reasons. Ultimately, if we can’t settle, we are selling your idea of a fair solution to a judicial officer. We do all we can not to have the decision maker have any reason to doubt our clients’ positions.
We are conveniently located in Minnetonka by the intersection of highways 394 and 494 and our parking ramp is free. Our mailing address indicates we are in Hopkins, but Plymouth and Wayzata are closer to our actual office. We are an easy drive from Eden Prairie, Medina, Orono, Excelsior, Maple Grove, Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, and the entire Lake Minnetonka area. We are also easily accessible by public transportation with a bus stop in front of our building. Our building and attached parking ramp are safe and secure.

Call today to learn more about my fee structure.

Experience

Attorney

Law Office of Glen A. Norton

2014 - Present

Attorney

Henningson & Snoxell Ltd.

2012 - 2014

Attorney

Law Office of Glen A. Norton PLLC

2007 - 2012

Attorney

Jensen & Sondrall

2002 - 2007

Partner

Ross & Norton PLLP

1995 - 2002

Admission

Verified United States Supreme Court

2013

Verified Federal District Court

1986

Verified United States 8th Circuit Court of Appeals

1986

Verified Minnesota

1986

Education

Gustavus Adolphus College

BA (English)

1981

Minnetonka High School

Diploma

1977

Recognitions & Achievements

Associations
  • Christian Legal Society of Minnesota | Member, Twin Cities Christian Legal Aid Volunteer
  • Christian Legal Society | Member
  • International Academy of Collaborative Professionals | Member
  • Association of Family and Conciliation Courts | Member
  • Minnesota Association For Justice | Member
  • Anoka County Bar Association | Member
  • Hennepin County Bar Association | Member
  • Minnesota State Bar Association, Family Law Section, Domestic Abuse Committee | Member
  • Minnesota State Bar Association, Family Law Section Executive Committee
    2008 - 2011
  • Minnesota State Bar Association, Legislative Committee Vice-Chair
    2007 - 2008
Honors / Awards
  • 10 Best in Client Satisfaction American Institute of Family Attorneys
    2016 - Present
  • Top 100 Minnesota Attorneys The National Advocates
    2016 - Present
  • Top 100 Family Law Attorneys in Minnesota American Society of Legal Advocates
    2016 - Present
  • Top 100 Family Law Attorney in Minnesota American Society of Legal Advocates
    2015 - Present
  • A+ Rating Better Business Bureau
    2015 - Present

Notable Work

Cases

Cases

Recently we had a case where one party was an aggressive litigator. She refused to respond to requests for information necessary to complete the case. The parties were disputing child custody, child support and parenting time. Both parties had their proposals declined by the other during settlement efforts. The court limited what information needed to be shared and ordered a response on all of the other material requested. One party still failed and refused to answer, despite our full answers to their requested information. We brought a motion to the court to preclude opposing party from presenting anything for evidence or argument at all in trial. The court responded that the judge was instead considering how long that party would spend in jail for violating the discovery order. The case settled that day, on favorable terms much like what our client proposed in the settlement negotiations by the attorneys. The other party avoided jail. Ultimately, that party had to reimburse our client over ten thousand dollars of the fees spent in order to force the disclosure of the necessary information. We can't promise that your case will result in this large a reimbursement of your litigation expenses with a difficult opposing party, although there are several theories upon which such a claim may advance. We will always seek justice for you in whatever form is appropriate. Some case facts herein may be conflated or changed to protect client identities.

Publications

Advanced Family Law Non-Traditional Families & Violence in the Home

2011