Glen A. Norton
Divorce and Child Custody Attorney
Divorce and Child Custody Attorney
Credit & Debt, Collection, Landlord-Tenant, Identity Theft,
5201 Eden Avenue Suite 300
Edina, MN 55436
Criminal, Misdemeanor, Felony,
10 S 5Th St Suite 1005
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Divorce & Family Law, Election & Political, Real Estate, Criminal, Business
60 South Sixth Street Suite 2800
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Estate,
1951 Concordia St. Suite 1200
Wayzata, MN 55391
Accident & Injury, Workers' Compensation, Personal Injury, Car Accident, Medical Malpractice
431 South 7th Street Suite 2420
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Social Security,
7380 France Ave South Suite 250
Edina, MN 55435
Divorce, Child Custody, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law,
310 South 4Th Avenue Suite 5010
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Accident & Injury, Animal Bite, Mass Torts, Car Accident, Wrongful Death
310 Fourth Avenue South Suite 5010
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Criminal, Accident & Injury,
400 S. 4th St #806M
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Call today to learn more about my fee structure.
Attorney
Law Office of Glen A. Norton
2014 - Present
Attorney
Henningson & Snoxell Ltd.
2012 - 2014
Attorney
Law Office of Glen A. Norton PLLC
2007 - 2012
Attorney
Jensen & Sondrall
2002 - 2007
Partner
Ross & Norton PLLP
1995 - 2002
United States Supreme Court
2013
Federal District Court
1986
United States 8th Circuit Court of Appeals
1986
Minnesota
1986
Gustavus Adolphus College
BA (English)
1981
Minnetonka High School
Diploma
1977
Cases
Recently we had a case where one party was an aggressive litigator. She refused to respond to requests for information necessary to complete the case. The parties were disputing child custody, child support and parenting time. Both parties had their proposals declined by the other during settlement efforts. The court limited what information needed to be shared and ordered a response on all of the other material requested. One party still failed and refused to answer, despite our full answers to their requested information. We brought a motion to the court to preclude opposing party from presenting anything for evidence or argument at all in trial. The court responded that the judge was instead considering how long that party would spend in jail for violating the discovery order. The case settled that day, on favorable terms much like what our client proposed in the settlement negotiations by the attorneys. The other party avoided jail. Ultimately, that party had to reimburse our client over ten thousand dollars of the fees spent in order to force the disclosure of the necessary information. We can't promise that your case will result in this large a reimbursement of your litigation expenses with a difficult opposing party, although there are several theories upon which such a claim may advance. We will always seek justice for you in whatever form is appropriate. Some case facts herein may be conflated or changed to protect client identities.
Advanced Family Law Non-Traditional Families & Violence in the Home
2011
Divorce, Child Support, Child Custody, Family Law, Wills & Probate, Paternity; Domestic Violence & Neglect