Gore DUI-DWI Lawyer, Virginia

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Seth Price
About | Practice Areas
Price Benowitz LLP
409 7Th St Nw Suite 200 Washington, DC 20004Â» view map
Criminal Law
Working Relentlessly For You

Our firm was built on the understanding that comprehensive representation does not begin and end in the courtroom.

202-600-9400
1. Seth Price Washington, DC
  Attorney at Law-DC,1996
  G. W. University Law School
2. AboutPrice Benowitz LLP
  Working Relentlessly for You
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Mark B. Williams

Farms, Adoption, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

12 Culpeper Street, Warrenton, VA 20186

Marie E. Washington

Construction Contracts, Estate Planning, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Contract

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

77 West Lee Street, Warrenton, VA 20186

Beau Correll

Federal Appellate Practice, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

10 W. Boscawen St., Winchester, VA 22601

Matthew Lane Kreitzer

Bankruptcy, DUI-DWI, Divorce, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Winchester, VA 22604

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

CONTINGENCY FEE

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obt... (more...)

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obtains after settling or winning the case. Often contingency fee agreements -- which are most commonly used in personal injury cases -- award the successful lawyer between 20% and 50% of the amount recovered. Lawyers representing defendants charged with crimes may not charge contingency fees. In most states, contingency fee agreements must be in writing.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Mwangi v. Com.

... The court found him guilty of driving under the influence (DUI), in violation of Code Â§ 18.2-266. ... Another of those exhibits, Exhibit 3, is a summons that purports to show that Mwangi had been convicted of DUI in the Alexandria General District Court. ...

Woody v. Com.

... County as a party. However, this case involved two simultaneous prosecutions â€” one on behalf of the Commonwealth (the refusal charge) and one on behalf of the County (the DUI charge). While the Commonwealth's Attorney ...

Grant v. Com.

682 SE2d 84 (2009). 54 Va. App. 714. Phillip Lawton GRANT v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 0877-08-4. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond. September 1, 2009. 85 Patrick M. Blanch, Assistant Public Defender ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Gore DUI-DWI Lawyer, Virginia

Sponsored Law Firm

Price Benowitz LLP

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Mark B. Williams

Marie E. Washington

Beau Correll

Matthew Lane Kreitzer

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BURGLARY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

DIRECTED VERDICT

JURY NULLIFICATION

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

ARREST WARRANT

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

WARRANT

CONTINGENCY FEE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Mwangi v. Com.

Woody v. Com.

Grant v. Com.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details