Inkom Criminal Lawyer, Idaho

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Craig Parrish
About | Practice Areas
Parrish Law Office
602 S 5th Ave P.O. Box 4321 Pocatello, ID 83205» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Quality & Caring Legal Services

Craig Parrish is a dedicated lawyer to his clients in the state of Idaho & focuses on helping those in need of quality, inexpensive legal assistance.

800-878-3120
1. Craig Parrish Pocatello, ID
  Attorney at Law - ID, 1993
  University of Idaho J.D. 1993
2. AboutParrish Law Office
  Quality & Caring Legal Services
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Kelly Kenneth Kumm

Juvenile Law, Lawsuit & Dispute, US Courts, Criminal, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1305 E. Center Street, Pocatello, ID 83201

Joseph Goddaeus Ballstaedt

Criminal, Real Estate, Contract, Litigation

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

201 E Center St., Pocatello, ID 83204

Nolan Ernest Wittrock

Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

201 East Center Street, Pocatello, ID 83201

Carol Tippi Jarman

Divorce & Family Law, Child Custody, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

201 East Center Street, Pocatello, ID 83201

Brian J. Cheney

Personal Injury, Business, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

216 West Whitman, Pocatello, ID 83204

Keith A Zollinger

Traffic, Transportation & Shipping, Employment, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

850 E Center St, Pocatello, ID 83201

John Joseph Bulger

Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

155 S. 2Nd Avenue, Pocatello, ID 83204

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

ACCESSORY

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An acces... (more...)

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An accessory is usually not physically present during the crime. For example, hiding a robber who is being sought by the police might make you an 'accessory after the fact' to a robbery. Compare accomplice.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Yakovac

... III. ANALYSIS. This case presents issues on direct appeal from the criminal proceeding and issues on appeal from the post-conviction relief action. ... 1. Applicable Legal Standard. A post-conviction relief petition initiates a civil, rather than criminal, proceeding. ...

Pizzuto v. State

... He also filed a motion under Rule 35 of the Idaho Criminal Rules to correct an illegal sentence, alleging that under Ring his sentence was illegal because a judge rather than a jury had made the factual findings upon which imposition of the death penalty was based. ...

State v. Bishop

... 690, 694-95, 66 L.Ed.2d 621, 628-29 (1981). An informant's tip regarding suspected criminal activity may give rise to reasonable suspicion when it would "warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that a stop was appropriate." White, 496 US at 329, 110 S.Ct. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Inkom Criminal Lawyer, Idaho

Sponsored Law Firm

Parrish Law Office

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Kelly Kenneth Kumm

Joseph Goddaeus Ballstaedt

Nolan Ernest Wittrock

Carol Tippi Jarman

Brian J. Cheney

Keith A Zollinger

John Joseph Bulger

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

PLEA BARGAIN

ARRAIGNMENT

SPECIFIC INTENT

FEDERAL COURT

LARCENY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

BURDEN OF PROOF

ACCESSORY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Yakovac

Pizzuto v. State

State v. Bishop

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details