Iselin Merger & Acquisition Lawyer, New Jersey

Sponsored Law Firm


Includes: Joint Ventures, Divestitures

Steven Firkser

Land Use & Zoning, Eminent Domain, Merger & Acquisition, Banking & Finance
Status:  In Good Standing           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Iselin Merger & Acquisition Lawyers and Iselin Merger & Acquisition Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Business areas including Administrative Law, Antitrust, Banking & Finance, Business Organization, Contract, Corporate, Insurance and Securities attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Angrisani v. FT VENTURES, LP

... One part of plaintiff's plan involved acquisition of existing companies engaged in the money transfer business. [1]. ... Shortly thereafter, FT Ventures pursued negotiations for acquisition of Uno Money Transfer Co. (Uno), a Brazilian money transfer company. ...

State v. Eckert

... Legislature expressly permitted the driver's license suspension applicable to a first conviction for refusing a breath test to be made concurrent with, or consecutive to, any revocation imposed for a DWI conviction, thereby evincing a legislative intent to prohibit the merger of the ...

State v. Quezada

... In State v. Gonzalez, 123 NJ 462, 588 A.2d 816 (1991), and State v. Dillihay, 127 NJ 42, 601 A.2d 1149 (1992), the Supreme Court held that, notwithstanding the anti-merger provisions of NJSA 2C:35-7, violations of that section merged into convictions for distribution and ...