Jackpot Dispute Resolution Lawyer, Nevada


Mary Sloan Glaser

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  34 Years

Victor N. Bunitsky

General Practice
Status:  Suspended           Licensed:  46 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Jackpot Dispute Resolution Lawyers and Jackpot Dispute Resolution Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Lawsuit & Dispute areas including Arbitration, Class Action, Lawsuit, Litigation and Mediation attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ruiz v. City of North Las Vegas

... decision: (1) under Nevada's Uniform Arbitration Act, he was a "party" to the arbitration proceeding capable of challenging the arbitration decision in district court; (2) the Union effectively assigned to him its rights under the CBA to pursue further dispute resolution; and (3) NRS ...

Zamora v. Price

... here, requiring the admission of the arbitration award is likely to provide an additional incentive to the parties so that they will take the arbitration proceedings seriously, thereby furthering the legitimate governmental interest of providing quicker and less costly dispute resolution. ...

Landreth v. Malik

... 113 Nev. 873, 877, 944 P.2d 246, 248 (1997). Barelli concerned an unmarried couple involved in a strictly contractual dispute, the resolution of which had the potential to revive claims for alimony and community property. Id. at 878, 944 P.2d at 249. ...