Jasper County, GA DUI-DWI Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Ronald Baker
About | Practice Areas
Ronald Baker Attorney at Law
11877 Douglas Rd Suite 102191 Johns Creek, GA 30005» view map
Intellectual Property Law
Working Relentlessly For You

Ronald Baker is a practicing lawyer in Georgia who handles cases involving Intellectual Property Law.

800-597-8640
1. Ronald Baker Johns Creek, GA
  Attorney at Law- GA
  Walter F. George School of Law, J.D.
2. AboutRonald Baker Attorney at Law
  Working Relentlessly For You
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Intellectual Property Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Jasper DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Jasper lawyers.

Ronny E. Jones

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Car Accident, Medical Malpractice, Estate, Divorce & Family Law

Ronny Jones is a practicing lawyer in the state of Georgia. Attorney Jones received his J.D. from the Georgetown University Law Center in 1982.

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-890-4540

12 Snowgoose Court, Monticello, GA 31064

Kenneth Glen Jackson

Personal Injury

Status: Suspended Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

200 Partridge Drive, Monticello, GA 31064

Larry Persons Lynch

Real Estate, Estate, Business, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 52 Years

CONTACT

790 Stock Farm Rd, Shady Dale, GA 31085

Daniel Brent Cochran

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

126 W. Greene Street, Monticello, GA 31064

Roy Robinson Kelly

Employment, Divorce, Adoption, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

Monticello, GA 31064

E. R. Lanier

Real Estate, Dispute Resolution, International, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 56 Years

CONTACT

267 College Street, Monticello, GA 31064

Timothy Larry Lam

Government, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

3075 Apt To Miss Road, Monticello, GA 31064

W. Dan Roberts

Government

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 62 Years

CONTACT

Monticello, GA 31064

Martha M. Warren

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 89 Years

CONTACT

Monticello, GA 31064

Charles E. Edwards

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 68 Years

CONTACT

Monticello, GA 31064

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Underwood

... Did the Court of Appeals err in affirming the grant of a defendant's motion to suppress the results of a State-administered breath test where an officer who had probable cause to arrest a defendant for DUI read the implied consent rights of OCGA Â§ 40-5-55[ [2] ] to the defendant ...

State v. Rish

... In granting that motion, the trial court found that the State lacked probable cause to arrest Rish for DUI-less safe (OCGA Â§ 40-6-391(a)(1)). While we affirm the trial court's ruling on this issue, we also find that, as a matter of law, the State did have probable cause to arrest Rish for ...

Wade v. State

... Following a bench trial, factually stipulated for trial purposes (to preclude the State's witnesses from having to appear), while preserving the due process issues for appellate review, Brittany Wade appeals her conviction of DUI less-safe, [1] contending that her bent of mind or ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Jasper County, GA DUI-DWI Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

Ronald Baker Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Ronny E. Jones

Kenneth Glen Jackson

Larry Persons Lynch

Daniel Brent Cochran

Roy Robinson Kelly

E. R. Lanier

Timothy Larry Lam

W. Dan Roberts

Martha M. Warren

Charles E. Edwards

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

HUNG JURY

CONVICTION

ACTUS REUS

CHARGE

ASSAULT

JURY NULLIFICATION

CAPITAL CASE

SPECIFIC INTENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Underwood

State v. Rish

Wade v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details