Koosharem DUI-DWI Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:
Michael Hepworth
Tyler Call | Tanner Clagett
Hepworth & Associates
Serving all of Utah » view map
Utah Criminal Lawyers
Things Get Better From Here

Providing professional and compassionate representation in various criminal cases. Hepworth & Associates are tough, strong and fair attorneys.

800-625-0860
1. Michael Hepworth Bountiful, UT
  Attorney At Law - Utah
  Sturm College of Law, J.D. - 2014
2. Tyler Call Bountiful, UT
  Attorney At Law - UT, 2015
  U of Oregon, J.D. - 2014
3. M. Tanner Clagett Bountiful, UT
  Attorney At Law - UT, 2016
  U of Denver, J.D. - 2014
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Koosharem DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Koosharem lawyers.

Lloyd D. Rickenbach

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

117 Rickenbach Road, Koosharem, UT 84744

Murray Herbert Falk

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

475 E 100 N, Monroe, UT 84754

Michael C Mathie

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

45 South 200 East, Monroe, UT 84754

Casey W Jewkes

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

835 East 300 North, Richfield, UT 84701

Ken Chamberlain

General Practice

Status: Deceased Licensed: 73 Years

CONTACT

225 N 100 E, Richfield, UT 84701

Jeffery P Gleave

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

205 Mountain View Ln, Monroe, UT 84754

Marvin Bagley

Lawsuit & Dispute

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

895 E 300 N St, Richfield, UT 84701

Marvin D Bagley

Lawsuit & Dispute

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

895 E 300 N St, Richfield, UT 84701

Mandy S Larsen

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

895 E 300 N, Richfield, UT 84701

Kay L Mciff

Real Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Government, Civil & Human Rights

Status: Deceased Licensed: 57 Years

CONTACT

225 North 100 East, Richfield, UT 84701

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

INFRACTION

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, ho... (more...)

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, however--refusing to identify oneself when involved in an accident is a misdemeanor in some states.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

BATTERY

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how... (more...)

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how severe the injury. A fist fight is a common battery; being hit by a wild pitch in a baseball game is not.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Palmer

... DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice: INTRODUCTION. Â¶ 1 Robert Palmer contends that the court of appeals erred in upholding his third-degree felony conviction under Utah's driving under the influence (DUI) recidivism enhancement statute. ... [2] Id. ("A [DUI] conviction ... ...

State v. Palmer

... McHUGH, Judge: Â¶ 1 Robert Palmer challenges his conviction under subsection (2)(a) of Utah Code section 41-6-44, which makes it unlawful to operate a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or any drug (DUI). ... Accordingly, we affirm Palmer's felony DUI conviction. ...

Orem City v. Longoria

... MEMORANDUM DECISION. BENCH, Judge: Â¶1 Defendant Jaime M. Longoria appeals his convictions for driving under the influence (DUI) and reckless driving, both class B misdemeanors. ... The jury again convicted Defendant of DUI and reckless driving, and he now appeals. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Koosharem DUI-DWI Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

Hepworth & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Lloyd D. Rickenbach

Murray Herbert Falk

Michael C Mathie

Casey W Jewkes

Ken Chamberlain

Jeffery P Gleave

Marvin Bagley

Marvin D Bagley

Mandy S Larsen

Kay L Mciff

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MOTION IN LIMINE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

BURGLARY

INFRACTION

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

JURY

BATTERY

CAPITAL CASE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Palmer

State v. Palmer

Orem City v. Longoria

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details