La Grange RICO Act Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Matthew Becker
About | Practice Areas
Becker Law Practice
333 University Ave Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825» view map
Criminal Defense Law
I Will Protect Your Rights

The Becker Law Practice is familiar with laws that impact the Sacramento area, and I provide local representation in matters that could benefit from my particular services.

800-996-3610
1. Matthew Becker Sacramento, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 2009
  Ave Maria School of Law J.D. 2007
2. AboutBecker Law Practice
  We fight our cases as hard as they need to be fought.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for La Grange RICO Act lawyer.
Below are all La Grange Criminal lawyers.

Clay Bedford

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Felony, Traffic

I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of California. My practice is limited to criminal defense and juvenile cases. The criminal... (more)

CONTACT

800-985-6320

91 N Washington St, Sonora, CA 95370

Jeffrey A. Tenenbaum

White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800 W 20th St, Merced, CA 95340

Charles Bradford Smith

Landlord-Tenant, Trusts, Criminal, Civil Rights, Defamation & Slander

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

Jamestown, CA 95327

David L. Axelrod

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

87 N. Washington Street, Sonora, CA 95370

Mark Stanley Borden

Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

86 S Green St, Sonora, CA 95370

Scott John Gross

Accident & Injury, Motor Vehicle, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

99 N Washington St, Sonora, CA 95370

Dana Rae Gross

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

99 N Washington St, Sonora, CA 95370

Patrick Greenwell

Construction, Criminal, Corporate, Contract

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

945 Morning Star Dr, Sonora, CA 95370

Thomas Michael Marovich

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 60 Years

CONTACT

24 S. Washington St, Sonora, CA 95370

Michael Weisberg

Corporate, Real Estate, Civil Rights, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

53 Bradford St, Sonora, CA 95370

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

La Grange RICO Act Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

Becker Law Practice

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Clay Bedford

Jeffrey A. Tenenbaum

Charles Bradford Smith

David L. Axelrod

Mark Stanley Borden

Scott John Gross

Dana Rae Gross

Patrick Greenwell

Thomas Michael Marovich

Michael Weisberg

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

DIRECTED VERDICT

MOTION IN LIMINE

SEARCH WARRANT

HOT PURSUIT

VENIREMEN

JURY

INDECENT EXPOSURE

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details