Mantua DUI-DWI Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

William Mooney
About | Practice Areas
Mooney Law Office
124 Middle Ave Suite M Elyria, OH 44035» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Diligently Defending & Protecting

Our attorney never backs down from a case and will fight fervently to minimize or eliminate the consequences of a criminal conviction.

216-973-7080
1. William Mooney Elyria, OH
  Attorney at Law - OH, 2011
  Cleveland State University J.D. 2011
2. AboutMooney Law Office
  Diligently Defending & Protecting Constitutional Rights
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Robert Botnick

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Traffic, Juvenile Law

Attorney Robert Botnick was born and raised in Cleveland, Ohio, where he attended Orange High School in Pepper Pike. He earned his bachelor’s degree... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

216-877-8505

20600 Chagrin Blvd, Shaker Heights, OH 44122

Michael B Washington

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Child Custody, Whistleblower, DUI-DWI, Business

Michael served 13 years as a Prosecuting Attorney in South Eastern Ohio. In private practice, he has broadened his work to all areas of criminal law ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-851-6480

P.O. Box 944, Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44223

Michael B. Bowler

Litigation, Employment, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

19 North High Street, Akron, OH 44308

Edward C. Weber

Constitutional Law, Traffic, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

159 South Main Street, Akron, OH 44308

Michael D. Dailey

Estate Planning, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

199 S. Chillicothe Rd., Aurora, OH 44202

Fred Bean

Employee Rights, DUI-DWI, Corporate, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

4620 Richmond Road, Cleveland, OH 44128

Allison Faye Hibbard

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2000 Auburn Drive, Beachwood, OH 44122

Keith E. Belkin

Immigration, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Corporate

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

28425 Edgedale Rd, Cleveland, OH 44124

Justin Martus Smith

Landlord-Tenant, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

20600 Chagrin Boulevard, Beachwood, OH 44122

Joel Alan Nash

DUI-DWI, Products Liability, Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

4325 Mayfield Rd., Cleveland, OH 44121

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Hoover

... consider the constitutionality of RC 4511.19(A)(2), which requires the imposition of criminal penalties upon certain persons who refuse to consent to chemical testing after being arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or a drug of abuse ("DUI"). ...

State v. Bragwell

... {Â¶2} On May 25, 2006, a Mahoning County grand jury indicted appellant on one count of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), a third-degree felony in violation of RC ... Appellant entered pleas of not guilty to the charge and specifications. This was appellant's thirteenth DUI. ...

State v. DETSKAS

... This question is relevant because Detskas was previously convicted in Michigan, under that state's law, for the offense of driving while impaired (DWI) (a lesser included offense of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Mantua DUI-DWI Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

Mooney Law Office

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert Botnick

Michael B Washington

Michael B. Bowler

Edward C. Weber

Michael D. Dailey

Fred Bean

Allison Faye Hibbard

Keith E. Belkin

Justin Martus Smith

Joel Alan Nash

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

FEDERAL COURT

SELF-INCRIMINATION

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

PLEA

LINEUP

NOLO CONTENDERE

BURDEN OF PROOF

ARREST WARRANT

HABEAS CORPUS

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Hoover

State v. Bragwell

State v. DETSKAS

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details