Mount Carmel Child Support Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gregory B. Smith
About | Practice Areas
Greg Smith And Associates
7324 Union Park Ave Suite 101 Midvale, UT 84047» view map
Divorce & Family Law
Aggressive & Experienced

We welcome the opportunity to give personalized advice in your case. We’ve successfully resolved thousands of criminal and other cases, and we can take your call now!

800-925-8751
1. Gregory B. Smith Midvale, UT
  Attorney at Law - UT, 1993
  Brigham Young University J.D. 1993
2. AboutGreg Smith And Associates
  Your Best Legal Option
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Divorce & Family Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Mount Carmel Child Support lawyer.
Below are all Mount Carmel Divorce & Family Law lawyers.

W. Tyler Melling

Pension & Benefits, Family Law, Elder Law, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

66 W Harding Ave, Cedar City, UT 84720

Edrick Jay Overson

Dispute Resolution, Immigration, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

36 N 300 W, Cedar City, UT 84721

E. Jay Overson

Divorce, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

36 North 300 West, Cedar City, UT 84720

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PATERNITY SUIT

A lawsuit to determine the identity of the father of a child born outside of marriage, and to provide for the support of the child once the identity of the fath... (more...)

A lawsuit to determine the identity of the father of a child born outside of marriage, and to provide for the support of the child once the identity of the father has been determined.

HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD

A person who supports and maintains, in one household, one or more people who are closely related to him by blood, marriage or adoption. Under federal income ta... (more...)

A person who supports and maintains, in one household, one or more people who are closely related to him by blood, marriage or adoption. Under federal income tax law, you are eligible for favorable tax treatment as the head of household only if you are unmarried and you manage a household which is the principal residence (for more than half of the year) of dependent children or other dependent relatives. Under bankruptcy homestead and exemption laws, the terms householder and 'head of household' mean the same thing. Examples include a single woman supporting her disabled sister and her own children or a bachelor supporting his parents. Many states consider a single person supporting only himself to be a head of household as well.

EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION

A legal principle, followed by most states, under which assets and earnings acquired during marriage are divided equitably (fairly) at divorce. In theory, equit... (more...)

A legal principle, followed by most states, under which assets and earnings acquired during marriage are divided equitably (fairly) at divorce. In theory, equitable means equal, but in practice it often means that the higher wage earner gets two-thirds to the lower wage earner's one-third. If a spouse obtains a fault divorce, the 'guilty' spouse may receive less than his equitable share upon divorce.

ADOPT

(1) To assume the legal relationship of parent to another person's child. See also adoption. (2) To approve or accept something -- for example, a legislative bo... (more...)

(1) To assume the legal relationship of parent to another person's child. See also adoption. (2) To approve or accept something -- for example, a legislative body may adopt a law or an amendment, a government agency may adopt a regulation or a party to a lawsuit may adopt a particular argument.

NO-FAULT DIVORCE

Any divorce in which the spouse who wants to split up does not have to accuse the other of wrongdoing, but can simply state that the couple no longer gets along... (more...)

Any divorce in which the spouse who wants to split up does not have to accuse the other of wrongdoing, but can simply state that the couple no longer gets along. Until no-fault divorce arrived in the 1970s, the only way a person could get a divorce was to prove that the other spouse was at fault for the marriage not working. No-fault divorces are usually granted for reasons such as incompatibility, irreconcilable differences, or irretrievable or irremediable breakdown of the marriage. Also, some states allow incurable insanity as a basis for a no-fault divorce. Compare fault divorce.

CONSOLIDATED OMNIBUS BUDGET RECONCILIATION ACT (COBRA)

A federal law requiring that employers offer employees -- and their spouses and dependents -- continuing insurance coverage if their work hours are cut or they ... (more...)

A federal law requiring that employers offer employees -- and their spouses and dependents -- continuing insurance coverage if their work hours are cut or they lose their job for any reason other than gross misconduct. Courts are still in the process of determining the meaning of gross misconduct, but it's clearly more serious than poor performance or judgment. COBRA also makes an ex-spouse and children eligible to receive group rate health insurance provided by the other ex-spouse's employer for three years following a divorce.

COLLUSION

Secret cooperation between two people in order to fool another. Collusion was often practiced by couples before no-fault divorce in order to make up a grounds f... (more...)

Secret cooperation between two people in order to fool another. Collusion was often practiced by couples before no-fault divorce in order to make up a grounds for divorce (such as adultery). By fabricating a permitted reason for divorce, colluding couples hoped to trick a judge into granting their freedom from the marriage. But a spouse accused of wrongdoing who later changed his or her mind about the divorce could expose the collusion to prevent the divorce from going through.

IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES

Differences between spouses that are considered sufficiently severe to make married life together more or less impossible. In a number of states, irreconcilable... (more...)

Differences between spouses that are considered sufficiently severe to make married life together more or less impossible. In a number of states, irreconcilable differences is the accepted ground for a no-fault divorce. As a practical matter, courts seldom, if ever, inquire into what the differences actually are, and routinely grant a divorce as long as the party seeking the divorce says the couple has irreconcilable differences. Compare incompatibility; irremediable breakdown.

FOSTER CARE

Court-ordered care provided to children who are unable to live in their own homes, usually because their parents have abused or neglected them. Foster parents h... (more...)

Court-ordered care provided to children who are unable to live in their own homes, usually because their parents have abused or neglected them. Foster parents have a legal responsibility to care for their foster children, but do not have all the rights of a biological parent--for example, they may have limited rights to discipline the children, to raise them according to a certain religion or to authorize non-emergency medical procedures for them. The foster parents do not become the child's legal parents unless the biological parents' rights are terminated by a court and the foster parents adopt the child. This is not typically encouraged, as the goal of foster care is to provide temporary support for the children until they can be returned to their parents. See also foster child.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ostermiller v. Ostermiller

... She sought child support and alimony. ... III. THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN ASSUMING THE REGULARITY OF THE PROCEEDINGS REGARDING THE TRIAL COURT'S FINDING THAT DAVID WAS NOT ENTITLED TO RETROACTIVE CHILD SUPPORT. ...

Arnold v. Arnold

... The parties' decree of divorce awarded no child support to either party due to their joint custody of AA and their equal incomes. ... App. 1994) (treating private school expenses as "part and parcel of the child support award"); see also Starley v. McDowell, 1999 UT App 46U, para. ...

O'DEA v. Olea

... You will not father this child. You will pay child support until the child is in college. You will never see this baby. ... 7 Mr. O'Dea took this conversation to mean that Ms. Olea was not placing the child for adoption because she referred to him having to pay child support. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Mount Carmel Child Support Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

Greg Smith And Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

W. Tyler Melling

Edrick Jay Overson

E. Jay Overson

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PATERNITY SUIT

HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD

EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION

ADOPT

NO-FAULT DIVORCE

CONSOLIDATED OMNIBUS BUDGET RECONCILIATION ACT (COBRA)

COLLUSION

IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES

FOSTER CARE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ostermiller v. Ostermiller

Arnold v. Arnold

O'DEA v. Olea

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details