Nome Misdemeanor Lawyer, Alaska

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Daniel Allan
About | Practice Areas
Dan Allan & Associates
800 E Dimond Blvd Suite 3-620 Anchorage, AK 99515» view map
Criminal Defense
More Than Just A Law Firm

At the Law Offices of Dan Allan and Associates, we believe in helping our clients get rid of some the stress their facing.

907-344-8851
1. Daniel Allan Anchorage, AK
  Attorney at Law- AK
  University of Tulsa College of Law, J.D. 1967
2. AboutDan Allan & Associates
  More Than Just A Law Firm
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Nome Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Nome lawyers.

Robert D. Lewis

Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

Nome, AK 99762

Kirsten Bey

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

Nome, AK 99762

A. Mark Gumaer

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

Nome, AK 99762

James Stanton Ferguson

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Nome, AK 99762

Margaret A. Thomas

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Nome, AK 99762

Erica R. J. Pryzmont

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

Nome, AK 99762

John A. Bioff

Employment, Civil & Human Rights, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

Nome, AK 99762

Alfred Mark Gumaer

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Nome, AK 99762

John A. Earthman

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Nome, AK 99762

H. Conner Thomas

Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Nome, AK 99762

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Nome Misdemeanor Lawyer, Alaska

Sponsored Law Firm

Dan Allan & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert D. Lewis

Kirsten Bey

A. Mark Gumaer

James Stanton Ferguson

Margaret A. Thomas

Erica R. J. Pryzmont

John A. Bioff

Alfred Mark Gumaer

John A. Earthman

H. Conner Thomas

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

ACQUITTAL

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

CAPITAL CASE

INFORMED CONSENT

EAVESDROPPING

MOTION IN LIMINE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details