Northampton Intellectual Property Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm


Jonathan B. Acklen

Litigation, Intellectual Property, Insurance, Personal Injury
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Andrew H. Ralston

Litigation, Intellectual Property, Insurance, Medical Malpractice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  22 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Lawyer.com can help you easily and quickly find Northampton Intellectual Property Lawyers and Northampton Intellectual Property Law Firms. Refine your search by specific Intellectual Property practice areas such as Copyright, International Intellectual Property, Patent and Trademark matters.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Fizzano Bros. Concrete Products, Inc. v. XLN, INC.

... 1. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, XLN sold most of its assets to XLNT but retained a copy of a derivative version of the Software (called T-Rex) along with two of its customers, several computer workstations and servers, and various intellectual property rights. Id. ...

Com. v. Omar

... any items or services bearing or identified by a counterfeit mark shall be guilty of the crime of trademark counterfeiting." 18 Pa.CS § 4119(a). [1] A counterfeit 182 mark is defined by the statute as either "(1) [a]ny unauthorized reproduction or copy of intellectual property" or "(2) [i ...

DECHERT LLP v. Com.

... Id. According to Dechert, "consideration paid for a license to use canned computer software is consideration paid for intangible intellectual property rights, that is, the right to use those instructions, not consideration paid for the transfer of tangible personal property." Id. at 15. ...