Oracle Misdemeanor Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

John Schill
About | Practice Areas
The Schill Law Group
8700 E VÃa de Ventura #210, Scottsdale, AZ 85258Â» view map
Criminal Defense, DUI-DWI
Criminal Lawyer

Have you been arrested for a crime? Criminal charges can have a negative effect on your reputation and future before you are convicted. Contact The Schill Law Group

480-525-8900
1. John Schill Phoenix, AZ
  Attorney at Law - Arizona, 1991
  Creighton University School of Law
2. AboutJohn Schill
  Mr. Schill is a client focused attorney with 25 years of criminal law experience.
3. Practice AreasServices
  Do not hesitate to hire a criminal attorney to fight your charges.
1. Contact
2. E-mail
3. Refer
4. Reviews
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Oracle Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Oracle Criminal lawyers.

Raul A Miranda

Other, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

10645 N Oracle Rd, Tucson, AZ 85737

Cedric Martin Hopkins

Federal Appellate Practice, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

10645 N Oracle Rd, Tucson, AZ 85737

Troy A Simon

Litigation, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Federal Trial Practice

Status: Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

11000 N La Canada Dr, Tucson, AZ 85737

Larry J Lingeman

Employment Discrimination, Criminal, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury

Status: Licensed: 54 Years

CONTACT

9892 N Ridge Shadow Pl, Tucson, AZ 85704

Joseph P DiRoberto

Traffic, Government Agencies, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 40 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1795 E Camino Cielo, Tucson, AZ 85718

Joseph K. Austin

Gaming & Alcohol, Indians & Native Populations, Criminal, Corporate

Status:

CONTACT

3386 W Crestone Ct, Tucson, AZ 85742

Saul M Huerta

Criminal, Immigration

Status: Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

6281 N Oracle Rd, Tucson, AZ 85740

Holly Kensington Senese

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

6352 N Pinnacle Ridge Dr, Tucson, AZ 85718

Rosemary Gordon Panuco

Other, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Animal Bite

Status: Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

7320 N La Cholla Blvd, Tucson, AZ 85741

Barbara S Gelband

Life & Health, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 52 Years

CONTACT

1418 W Cerrada Colima Place, Tucson, AZ 85704

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PUBLIC DEFENDER

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and ar... (more...)

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and are unable to pay for their own defense.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

MISDEMEANOR

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk d... (more...)

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk driving and leaving the scene of an accident are all common misdemeanors.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

CRIME

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defin... (more...)

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defined by Congress and state legislatures.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Fushek v. State

... OPINION. HURWITZ, Justice. Â¶ 1 This case requires us to decide whether the Arizona Constitution guarantees a jury trial to a misdemeanor defendant when the State files a special allegation of sexual motivation pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes ("ARS") Â§ 13-118 (2001). I. ...

State v. Garcia

... OPINION. GEMMILL, Judge. Â¶ 1 The State of Arizona appeals the trial court's designation of defendant Felipe A. Garcia's conviction for disorderly conduct as a class 1 misdemeanor. ... Disorderly conduct under subsection A, paragraph 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 is a class 1 misdemeanor."). ...

State v. Russell

... The trial court correctly held, however, that a felony offense remains a felony unless and until a court designates it a misdemeanor after conviction. ... We disagree. I. A trial court may designate a class 6 felony as a misdemeanor only after conviction of the felony. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Oracle Misdemeanor Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

The Schill Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Raul A Miranda

Cedric Martin Hopkins

Troy A Simon

Larry J Lingeman

Joseph P DiRoberto

Joseph K. Austin

Saul M Huerta

Holly Kensington Senese

Rosemary Gordon Panuco

Barbara S Gelband

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PUBLIC DEFENDER

CHARGE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

JURY NULLIFICATION

NOLO CONTENDERE

EAVESDROPPING

MISDEMEANOR

DIRECTED VERDICT

CRIME

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Fushek v. State

State v. Garcia

State v. Russell

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS