Patrick Consumer Protection Lawyer, South Carolina


Includes: Warranties, Recreational Products

Franklin B. Joyner

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           

William Dennis Curtis

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  11 Years

Joel Stroud

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Mary Thomas Johnson-Lee

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Roger E. Henderson

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Joel Flake Stroud

Other, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           

Kernard Edward Redmond

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Thomas E. Ingram

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Jay E. Hodge

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Andrew Foster McLeod

Government
Status:  In Good Standing           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Patrick Consumer Protection Lawyers and Patrick Consumer Protection Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Consumer Rights areas including Identity Theft attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

SEA COVE DEV'T v. Harbourside Cmty. Bank

... In this case, Sea Cove contended section 37-10-107 violates Article III, section 17 because, although the statute is in the Consumer Protection Code, it has no relation to protecting consumers and is really a statute of frauds provision that protects banks. ...

DEPT. OF CONSUMER v. FORECLOSURE SPEC.

... Id. § 119. The South Carolina Consumer Protection Code (the Code) also grants powers to the Department. See SCCode Ann. §§ 37-6-101 to -113 (2002 & Supp.2009). ... The General Assembly amended the Consumer Protection Code in 2005. ...

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS v. FORECLOSURE SPECIALISTS, INC.

... Id. § 119. The South Carolina Consumer Protection Code (the Code) also grants powers to the Department. See SC Code Ann. §§ 37-6-101 to -113 (2002 & Supp. 2009). ... The General Assembly amended the Consumer Protection Code in 2005. ...