Ask A Lawyer

Tell Us Your Case Information for Fastest Lawyer Match!

Please include all relevant details from your case including where, when, and who it involves.
Case details that can effectively describe the legal situation while also staying concise generally receive the best responses from lawyers.


By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy

Robert C. Delahunty

Robert Delahunty Lawyer

Robert C. Delahunty

Business Organization, Corporate, Environmental Law, Tax

(Please indicate if you do not want referral sent to multiple lawyers.)

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy

Bob Delahunty is a shareholder and a member of the Corporate and Tax department. He advises and assists clients on business matters involving corporate, securities and general commercial law, with an emphasis on structuring, negotiating and documenting complex transactions. He has advised companies that utilize emerging technology in a broad range of matters, including the purchase, sale and financing of businesses, mergers, proxy statements and SEC compliance work and complex licensing arrangements.

Bob began practice as an associate with Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton in Los Angeles, California, became an associate and shareholder at the Salt Lake City law firm of Prince, Yeates & Geldzahler, and from 1982 until he joined Parsons Behle & Latimer in May of 1992, was a founding partner/shareholder of Hansen Jones & Leta.

Related Activities and Skills:

  • Utah Law Review, Member and Editor 1974-76

School Degree Major Graduation
University of Utah College of Law Law School N/A
State / Court Date
Utah 1978 N/A
California 1976 N/A

Service Type:Private


MAIN LOCATION

201 South Main Street
Suite 1800
Salt Lake City, UT 84111

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Injured Worker Did Not Have Requisite Causal Opinion From Doctor
In a recent 8th District decision, the Court affirmed summary judgment in favor of an employer who argued that records from claimant's treating physicians did not establish sufficient causal connection between diagnosis and workplace injury.
reedom to Operate Opinions: The Value of a Bold Patent Landscape Study
http://www.boldip.com/bold-blog/bold-update-freedom-to-operate-opinions-the-value-of-a-bold-patent-landscape-study
Federal Trademark Protection and the Likelihood of Confusion Test
http://www.boldip.com/bold-blog/-federal-trademark-protection-and-the-likelihood-of-confusion-test