Ask A Lawyer

Tell Us Your Case Information for Fastest Lawyer Match!

Please include all relevant details from your case including where, when, and who it involves.
Case details that can effectively describe the legal situation while also staying concise generally receive the best responses from lawyers.


By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy

Robin Blain Schwebs

Robin Schwebs Lawyer

Robin Blain Schwebs
(Upgrade Listing)

Workers' Compensation

  • Law School: Western State
  • Status: In Good Standing
  • Licensed: 21 years

(Please indicate if you do not want referral sent to multiple lawyers.)

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy
School Degree Major Graduation
Western State University College of Law Law School N/A
Western State Univ; Fullerton CA Bachelor N/A N/A
State / Court Date
California 1995

CA State Lawyer Additional Information: Status History: 4/4/1995 Admitted to The State Bar of California Sections: Worker's Compensation District: District 2

Service Type:General

Update Date:2015-05-20


MAIN LOCATION

121 Spring St
Claremont, CA 91711

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Bridge Over Troubled Waters: Service During Disaster as a Form of Professionalism
An article outlining the responsibility of the Bar to come to the aid of the community in times of disaster and suggesting that service of this nature is, in essence, the evolution of professionalism.
NVC Sending Letters to Correct Erroneous Form I-130 Denials
On January 26, 2016, the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) reported that the Department of State’s (DOS’s) National Visa Center (NVC) has begun sending letters to immigrant visa applicants who were erroneously sent termination letters under section 203(g)...
The Supreme Court Grants Review of DAPA Case
The Supreme Court has granted review of the Fifth Circuit's decision to uphold an injunction against the DAPA program. In this blog post, I will explain what this development means, and the unusual decision by the Supreme Court to add an issue to the case which was not decided by the Fifth Circuit.