within 15 miles of Edinburg Texas


Alex R. Hernandez Jr. PLLC

Accident & Injury

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Richard R. Alamia Attorney at Law

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Immigration, Lawsuit & Dispute, Real Estate

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

JS Palacios, PLLC

Personal Injury, Administrative Law, Family Law, Juvenile Law

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Olivia Law

Bankruptcy & Debt

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Tijerina Legal Group, PC

Personal Injury, Car Accident, Wrongful Death, Aviation Accident, Slip & Fall Accident

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Carlos E Hernandez

Employment, Civil & Human Rights, Business

The Law Offices Of Antonio D Pena

Adoption, Child Support, Criminal, Farms, DUI-DWI

Colvin Chaney Saenz & Rodriguez LLP

Employment, Insurance, Litigation, Personal Injury, Products Liability

Colvin Chaney Saenz & Rodriguez LLP

Bad Faith Insurance, Dental Malpractice, Employment, Insurance, Labor Law

Kittleman Thomas & Gonzales LLP

Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy, Corporate, Business Organization, Credit & Debt

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Bergin v. Texas Beef Group

... On May 4, 1995, after it received three letters from the Bergins, Texas Beef filed suit against them in Randall County seeking a judgment declaring the Bergins' claims were barred by §§ 251.001-251.005 of the Texas Agriculture Code. ...

TXI Transp. Co. v. Hughes

... III. The Illegal Immigrant Issue. TXI next argues that it was error to admit evidence of Rodriguez's immigration status and his misrepresentation of that status in order to live and work in this country. ... B. Use of Immigration Status as Impeachment Evidence. ...

Brooks v. State

We granted discretionary review in this case to address, among other things, whether there is any meaningful distinction between a legal-sufficiency standard under Jackson v. Virginia [1] and a factual-sufficiency standard under Clewis v. State and whether there is a need to ...